The article examines the transformation of legal activity in the context of the digitalization of social relations. Attention is paid to the change in the interpretative paradigm of the modern lawyer, caused by the transition from the dominance of hermeneutics of legal text to the urgency to interpret algorithms as technically mediated carriers of normativity. The influence of algorithmic systems and digital platforms on the processes of law enforcement, public administration, and the realization of rights is considered, and the role of algorithms in the formation of new de facto regulatory effects is outlined. It is argued that algorithms in contemporary social and legal practices perform the function of “normativity operators,” mediating access to public services, determining the priority of administrative procedures, and influencing the trajectories of procedural rights. The example of judicial practice shows that legally significant consequences for individuals may arise from the functioning of digital systems in the absence of a formalized individual administrative act, which raises the issue of algorithm transparency and the effectiveness of legal control. The risks of human rights violations due to the opacity of algorithmic decisions, possible discriminatory effects, and the delegation of authority to digital systems without proper accountability procedures are highlighted. The necessity of developing interpretative approaches focused on the analysis of algorithmic logic, data sources, and value assumptions embedded in digital systems, is justified. The interpretation of algorithms is a required element in ensuring the principles of the rule of law, legal certainty, proportionality, and non-discrimination. It is concluded that the legal activity transformation in the digital era is a change in the interpretative paradigm, which requires a rethinking of the professional competencies of lawyers, the development of interdisciplinary methodological tools, and the formation of new standards of legal argumentation. The implementation of these tasks is a prerequisite for preserving the value and normative dimension of law in the context of the growing algorithmization of public administration and law enforcement.