Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ): Psychometric Properties and Item‐Level Empirical Correlates
Authors:
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Vol. 32 (4) , e70099
Abstract
Objective: To investigate scale‐level and especially item‐level correlates of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) with an emphasis on its clinical usefulness in primary care settings. In addition, gender‐based correlate differences were explored to test whether gender‐specific conclusions were warranted. Overall, the current empirical correlates sought to improve the PDSQ's precision in clinical interpretations. Method: The current dataset was composed of 234 primary care patients, systematically evaluated via the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 Disorders‐Research Version (SCID‐5‐RV) for 10 common mental disorders. Rather than using the typical skip‐out logic, the 10 modules were administered in their entirety, providing item‐level correlates for the PDSQ as the index measure. Results: When adequately represented ( n ≥ 10), PDSQ subscales produced strong scale homogeneities ( M alpha = 0.85). At the item level, they evidenced strong convergent validities ( M r = 0.64), clearly more than doubled their discriminant validities ( M r = 0.25). Adopting a stringent criterion ( r ≥ 0.35), 273 PDSQ empirical correlates were established for common diagnoses. Regarding gender, seven disorders produced similar scale correlates, whereas three were divergent. Conclusion: As the third independent investigation, PDSQ item‐level correlates have been empirically validated in both psychiatric and primary care settings. The PDSQ, in its expanded role, provided valuable clinical data regarding DSM‐5 symptoms and clinical characteristics. Summary: Consistent with the first objective, the PDSQ subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency and construct validity. For specific symptoms and clinical characteristics, the PDSQ is distinguished from most self‐report psychological measures regarding the precision of its clinical findings via item‐level correlates. In the context of the replication crisis, rigorous criteria were applied to bivariate correlates, ranging from moderate ( r s ≥ 0.35) to very large ( r s ≥ 0.60) for each PDSQ subscale.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forensics: Methodological Challenges and Empirical Evidence2025
- Determining the MMPI‐3 SUI scale's cross‐sectional and prospective utility in suicide risk assessmentJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2024
- Rates of denying suicide ideation proximate to death by suicide: A re-analysisGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2022
- How Common is Recent Denial of Suicidal Ideation among Ideators, Attempters, and Suicide Decedents? A Literature ReviewGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2021
- Comorbid mental disorders, depression symptom severity, and role impairment among Veterans initiating depression treatment through the Veterans Health AdministrationJournal of Affective Disorders, 2021
- Psychometric properties of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 Disorders‐Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)Brain and Behavior, 2021
- Mental health delivery in primary care: The perspectives of primary care providersArchives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2019
- Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 (SCID)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2017
- DIAGNOSTIC OVERLAP OF GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER AND MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER IN A PRIMARY CARE SAMPLEDepression and Anxiety, 2012
- A Self-Report Scale to Help Make Psychiatric DiagnosesArchives of General Psychiatry, 2001