Gender gap for accelerometry-based physical activity across different age groups in five Brazilian cohort studies
Preprint
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the gender inequalities in accelerometer-based physical activity (PA) across different age groups using data from five Pelotas (Brazil) cohorts. Methods: The data comes from four birth cohort studies, covering all live births in the urban area of Pelotas for each respective year (1982, 1993, 2004, and 2015), and the ‘ Como vai? ’ cohort study focusing on 60 years and above. Raw accelerometry data were collected on the non-dominant wrist using GENEActive/Actigraph devices and processed with the GGIR package. Overall PA was calculated at ages 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 15, 18, 23, 30, and 60+ years, while moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) was calculated from six years onwards. Absolute (difference) and relative (ratio) gender inequalities were calculated and intersectionality between gender and wealth was also evaluated. Results: The sample sizes per cohort ranged from 965 to 3462 participants. The mean absolute gender gap was 19.3 minutes (95%CI: 12.7; 25.9), with the widest gap at 18 years (32.9 minutes; 95%CI: 30.1; 35.7) for MVPA. The highest relative inequality was found in older adults (ratio 2.0; 95%CI 1.92 to 2.08). Our intersectionality results showed that the poorest men being the most active group, accumulating around 60 minutes more MVPA per day compared with the wealthiest women at age 18. Conclusion: Men were more physically active than women in all ages evaluated. PA gender inequalities start at an early age and intensifies in transition periods of life. Relative inequalities were marked among older adults. What is already known on this topic: Gender inequalities in physical activity have been reported globally, but most of the evidence is focused in adolescents and young adults. The literature lacks studies on children and older adults. What this study adds: We present gender inequalities in accelerometer-based physical activity across several age groups, from 1 year olds to older adults. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Ou study provides a comprehensive description of gender inequalities, identifying key age groups for intervention.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 21 (11), 1158.
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender and global health: evidence, policy, and inconvenient truthsThe Lancet, 2013
- Separating Movement and Gravity Components in an Acceleration Signal and Implications for the Assessment of Human Daily Physical ActivityPLOS ONE, 2013
- Intersectionality and Global Gender InequalityGender & Society, 2012
- Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: A systematic reviewInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012
- Cohort Profile: The 2004 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Physical Activity Status and Gender Differences in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Chronic DiseasesJournal of Nursing Research, 2010
- Associations between sex-typed behaviour at age 31/2 and levels and patterns of physical activity at age 12: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and ChildrenArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2010
- Cohort Profile: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Cohort Profile: The 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of IndiaDemography, 2001