Gender Gap for Accelerometry-Based Physical Activity Across Different Age Groups in 5 Brazilian Cohort Studies
Authors:
- Luiza I.C. RicardoLuiza I.C. Ricardo
- Andrea WendtAndrea Wendt
- Debora TornquistDTDebora Tornquist
- Helen GonçalvesHGHelen Gonçalves
- Fernando WehrmeisterFWFernando Wehrmeister
- Bruna Gonçalves C. da SilvaBSBruna Gonçalves C. da Silva
- Luciana Tovo-RodriguesLTLuciana Tovo-Rodrigues
- Iná SantosISIná Santos
- Aluisio BarrosABAluisio Barros
- Alicia MatijasevichAMAlicia Matijasevich
- Pedro C. HallalPHPedro C. Hallal
- Marlos DominguesMDMarlos Domingues
Open Access
- 1 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Human Kinetics in Journal of Physical Activity and Health
- Vol. 21 (11) , 1158-1166
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the gender inequalities in accelerometer-based physical activity (PA) across different age groups using data from 5 Pelotas (Brazil) cohorts. Methods: The data come from 4 birth cohort studies, covering all live births in the urban area of Pelotas for each respective year (1982, 1993, 2004, and 2015), and the Como vai? cohort study focusing on 60 years and above. Raw accelerometry data were collected on the nondominant wrist using GENEActive/ActiGraph devices and processed with the GGIR package. Overall PA was calculated at ages 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 15, 18, 23, 30, and 60+ years, while moderate to vigorous PA was calculated from 6 years onward. Absolute (difference) and relative (ratio) gender inequalities were calculated and intersectionality between gender and wealth was also evaluated. Results: The sample sizes per cohort ranged from 965 to 3462 participants. The mean absolute gender gap was 19.3 minutes (95% confidence interval, 12.7–25.9), with the widest gap at 18 years (32.9 min; 95% confidence interval, 30.1–35.7) for moderate to vigorous PA. The highest relative inequality was found in older adults (ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.92–2.08). Our intersectionality results showed that the poorest men being the most active group, accumulating around 60 minutes more moderate to vigorous PA per day compared with the wealthiest women at age 18. Conclusions: Men were more physically active than women in all ages evaluated. PA gender inequalities start at an early age and intensify in transition periods of life. Relative inequalities were marked among older adults.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socio-demographics, neighborhood characteristics, time use, and leisure-time physical activity engagement patterns over the life courseSSM - Population Health, 2022
- Gender inequalities in physical activity among adolescents from 64 Global South countriesJournal of Sport and Health Science, 2022
- Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participantsThe Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2020
- Time to tackle the physical activity gender gapThe Lancet Public Health, 2019
- Gender Inequality and Sex Differences in Physical Fighting, Physical Activity, and Injury Among Adolescents Across 36 CountriesJournal of Adolescent Health, 2019
- Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participantsThe Lancet Global Health, 2018
- Shifting the Physical Inactivity Curve Worldwide by Closing the Gender GapSports Medicine, 2017
- Gender and global health: evidence, policy, and inconvenient truthsThe Lancet, 2013
- The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 2012
- BootstrapWIREs Computational Statistics, 2011