Non‐identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non‐random nature of monozygotic twinning: A review
- 10 April 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Vol. 151C (2) , 110-127
Abstract
Monozygotic twins (MZ) are rarely absolutely “identical.” This review discusses the types of genetic/epigenetic and prenatal environmental post‐zygotic mechanisms that cause discordance within such twin pairs. Some of these mechanisms—ranging from heterokaryotypia to skewed X‐chromosome inactivation—may cause extreme discordance, but these extremes are merely the more emphatic examples of discordance that, to some degree, underlies the majority of MZ twin pairs. Because of the entrenched misconception that MZ twins are necessarily identical, many MZ twin pairs are mistakenly designated as dizygotic (DZ). Clinical benefits to accurate zygosity determination include correct solid organ transplantation matching, if one twin requires donation for a non‐genetically mediated disease; the opportunity of preventive management for disorders that do not manifest synchronously; and better counseling to parents regarding their individually unique, and often psychologically puzzling, twin offspring. In twin pairs with complex and confusing biological origins, more detailed zygosity testing may be required. For example, intermediate trigametic and tetragametic chimeric dizygotic twins are reviewed, some of whom are, nevertheless, monochorionic (MC). Because of inter‐fetal vascular anastomoses in MC twins, genetic results from blood samples may not accurately reflect discordance in solid organs. Previously, it was thought that MZ twinning was some sort of embryological fluke. However, familial monozygotic twinning is more common than suggested by the literature. Seven new families are presented in an accompanying paper. Despite the difficulties and dangers of twin pregnancy (especially so for MC twins), human twinning persists, and continues to both challenge and fascinate parents, clinicians and geneticists.Keywords
This publication has 154 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asymmetric mitosis: Unequal segregation of proteins destined for degradationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Phenotypically Concordant and Discordant Monozygotic Twins Display Different DNA Copy-Number-Variation ProfilesThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2008
- A study to determine the incidence of structural congenital heart disease in monochorionic twinsPrenatal Diagnosis, 2006
- Increased DNA Methylation at the AXIN1 Gene in a Monozygotic Twin from a Pair Discordant for a Caudal Duplication AnomalyThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2006
- Evidence for monozygotic twin (MZ) discordance in methylation level at two CpG sites in the promoter region of the catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT) geneAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 2006
- Dizygotic twin pregnancy conceived with assisted reproductive technology associated with chromosomal anomaly, imprinting disorder, and monochorionic placentationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2005
- Isolated imperforate anus in monozygotic twins: case report and implicationsJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2005
- Phenotypic discordance in monozygotic twins with 22q11.2 deletionAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1998
- Identical mitochondrial DNA in monozygotic twins with discordant adrenoleukodystrophy phenotypeAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- A twin-pronged attack on complex traitsNature Genetics, 1997