Geoffrey Machin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Geoffrey Machin has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Navneet Gogia
Fetal Genetic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, The Permanente Medical Group, 280 West MacArthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94611, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 6 September 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology
- Vol. 30 (6) , 414-430
Funisitis and Chorionic Vasculitis: Relation to Chorioamnionitis, Timing and Scoring
Five hundred consecutive cases with histologic chorioamnionitis and umbilical cord inflammation were analyzed to develop a staging system for funisitis and to correlate stage of funisitis with stage of chorioamnionitis in order to estimate the timing of various stages of funisitis. Funisitis progresses through venous involvement (with or without Wharton's jelly inflammation) to arterial involvement without Wharton's jelly and then full involvement of all three vessels and surrounding Wharton's jelly. Arterial involvement and full funisitis are strongly associated with stage III/IV chorioamnionitis, and imply a significant time interval following the onset of amniotic cavity inflammation.
- 6 September 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Fetal and Pediatric Pathology
- Vol. 30 (6) , 414-430
Funisitis and Chorionic Vasculitis: Relation to Chorioamnionitis, Timing and Scoring
Five hundred consecutive cases with histologic chorioamnionitis and umbilical cord inflammation were analyzed to develop a staging system for funisitis and to correlate stage of funisitis with stage of chorioamnionitis in order to estimate the timing of various stages of funisitis. Funisitis progresses through venous involvement (with or without Wharton's jelly inflammation) to arterial involvement without Wharton's jelly and then full involvement of all three vessels and surrounding Wharton's jelly. Arterial involvement and full funisitis are strongly associated with stage III/IV chorioamnionitis, and imply a significant time interval following the onset of amniotic cavity inflammation.
- 10 April 2009
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Vol. 151C (2) , 110-127
Non‐identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non‐random nature of monozygotic twinning: A review
Monozygotic twins (MZ) are rarely absolutely “identical.” This review discusses the types of genetic/epigenetic and prenatal environmental post‐zygotic mechanisms that cause discordance within such twin pairs. Some of these mechanisms—ranging from heterokaryotypia to skewed X‐chromosome inactivation—may cause extreme discordance, but these extremes are merely the more emphatic examples of discordance that, to some degree, underlies the majority of MZ twin pairs. Because of the entrenched misconception that MZ twins are necessarily identical, many MZ twin pairs are mistakenly designated as dizygotic (DZ). Clinical benefits to accurate zygosity determination include correct solid organ transplantation matching, if one twin requires donation for a non‐genetically mediated disease; the opportunity of preventive management for disorders that do not manifest synchronously; and better counseling to parents regarding their individually unique, and often psychologically puzzling, twin offspring. In twin pairs with complex and confusing biological origins, more detailed zygosity testing may be required. For example, intermediate trigametic and tetragametic chimeric dizygotic twins are reviewed, some of whom are, nevertheless, monochorionic (MC). Because of inter‐fetal vascular anastomoses in MC twins, genetic results from blood samples may not accurately reflect discordance in solid organs. Previously, it was thought that MZ twinning was some sort of embryological fluke. However, familial monozygotic twinning is more common than suggested by the literature. Seven new families are presented in an accompanying paper. Despite the difficulties and dangers of twin pregnancy (especially so for MC twins), human twinning persists, and continues to both challenge and fascinate parents, clinicians and geneticists.
- 10 April 2009
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Vol. 151C (2) , 110-127
Non‐identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non‐random nature of monozygotic twinning: A review
Monozygotic twins (MZ) are rarely absolutely “identical.” This review discusses the types of genetic/epigenetic and prenatal environmental post‐zygotic mechanisms that cause discordance within such twin pairs. Some of these mechanisms—ranging from heterokaryotypia to skewed X‐chromosome inactivation—may cause extreme discordance, but these extremes are merely the more emphatic examples of discordance that, to some degree, underlies the majority of MZ twin pairs. Because of the entrenched misconception that MZ twins are necessarily identical, many MZ twin pairs are mistakenly designated as dizygotic (DZ). Clinical benefits to accurate zygosity determination include correct solid organ transplantation matching, if one twin requires donation for a non‐genetically mediated disease; the opportunity of preventive management for disorders that do not manifest synchronously; and better counseling to parents regarding their individually unique, and often psychologically puzzling, twin offspring. In twin pairs with complex and confusing biological origins, more detailed zygosity testing may be required. For example, intermediate trigametic and tetragametic chimeric dizygotic twins are reviewed, some of whom are, nevertheless, monochorionic (MC). Because of inter‐fetal vascular anastomoses in MC twins, genetic results from blood samples may not accurately reflect discordance in solid organs. Previously, it was thought that MZ twinning was some sort of embryological fluke. However, familial monozygotic twinning is more common than suggested by the literature. Seven new families are presented in an accompanying paper. Despite the difficulties and dangers of twin pregnancy (especially so for MC twins), human twinning persists, and continues to both challenge and fascinate parents, clinicians and geneticists.
- 10 April 2009
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Vol. 151C (2) , 152-154
Familial monozygotic twinning: A report of seven pedigrees
Seven families contained 19 MZ twin pairs (2.7 pairs/family), diagnosed by low‐stringency variable number tandem repeats in DNA from placental tissue or blood. Chorion status was known in 10 pairs, 6 dichorionic, 4 monochorionic. Sex ratio was equal. Autosomal dominant inheritance is apparent.
- 10 April 2009
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Vol. 151C (2) , 152-154
Familial monozygotic twinning: A report of seven pedigrees
Seven families contained 19 MZ twin pairs (2.7 pairs/family), diagnosed by low‐stringency variable number tandem repeats in DNA from placental tissue or blood. Chorion status was known in 10 pairs, 6 dichorionic, 4 monochorionic. Sex ratio was equal. Autosomal dominant inheritance is apparent.
- 1 November 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology
- Vol. 11 (6) , 424-429
Maternal Thrombophilias Are Associated with Specific Placental Lesions
Maternal floor infarction (MFI), massive perivillous fibrin deposition (MPVFD), and fetal thrombotic vasculopathy (FTV) are specific placental lesions with associations to recurrent adverse fetal outcomes and with maternal thrombophilia. We studied the frequency of a range of acquired and genetic maternal thrombophilias in MFI (40 cases), MPVFD (87 cases), FTV (7 cases), and FTV+MPVFD (4 cases). Thrombophilias were identified in 16 (40%), 20 (23%), 5 (71%), and 2 (50%) of these lesions, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the identified thrombophilias were genetic, and 23% were acquired. The most common genetic thrombophilia was protein S deficiency, which constituted 14 of the 36 genetic thrombophilias (39%). We advocate full maternal thrombophilia testing when the diagnosis of MFI, MPVFD, and FTV is made by placental pathology examination. Because of the possible contribution of paternal thrombophilic mutations to the fetal genotype, it would be desirable to test the whole family as well.
- 1 November 2008
- Published by SAGE Publications in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology
- Vol. 11 (6) , 424-429
Maternal Thrombophilias Are Associated with Specific Placental Lesions
Maternal floor infarction (MFI), massive perivillous fibrin deposition (MPVFD), and fetal thrombotic vasculopathy (FTV) are specific placental lesions with associations to recurrent adverse fetal outcomes and with maternal thrombophilia. We studied the frequency of a range of acquired and genetic maternal thrombophilias in MFI (40 cases), MPVFD (87 cases), FTV (7 cases), and FTV+MPVFD (4 cases). Thrombophilias were identified in 16 (40%), 20 (23%), 5 (71%), and 2 (50%) of these lesions, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the identified thrombophilias were genetic, and 23% were acquired. The most common genetic thrombophilia was protein S deficiency, which constituted 14 of the 36 genetic thrombophilias (39%). We advocate full maternal thrombophilia testing when the diagnosis of MFI, MPVFD, and FTV is made by placental pathology examination. Because of the possible contribution of paternal thrombophilic mutations to the fetal genotype, it would be desirable to test the whole family as well.
- 1 August 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 515-530
Why is it important to diagnose chorionicity and how do we do it?
- 1 August 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 515-530
Why is it important to diagnose chorionicity and how do we do it?