Difference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study
Open Access
- 13 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Dentistry Journal
- Vol. 14 (3) , 169
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The achievement of stable and functional occlusal contacts represents a key objective of orthodontic treatment, particularly in growing patients. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities in establishing adequate occlusal contacts in growing patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare occlusal contact characteristics following clear aligner therapy (CAT) and fixed orthodontic therapy (FAT). Methods: Twenty-four growing patients (p < 0.05). Statistical difference was also observed in the antero-posterior ratio, with FAT presenting fewer anterior contacts in OCS, NOCS, half-mm, and one-mm measurements (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of left–right asymmetry or post-treatment single-tooth contacts, except for the second premolar, which exhibited higher contacts in the FAT group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Fixed orthodontic treatment is more effective than aligners in achieving adequate occlusal contacts, with differences limited to tight contacts and antero-posterior occlusal distribution.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental modelsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2024
- Evaluation of the predicted vs. achieved occlusal outcomes with the Invisalign® appliance: A retrospective investigation of adult patientsInternational Orthodontics, 2023
- Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviewsClinical Oral Investigations, 2022
- Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear alignersClinical and Experimental Dental Research, 2020
- Evolution of occlusion and temporomandibular disorder in orthodontics: Past, present, and futureAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2015
- Assessment of Invisalign treatment outcomes using the ABO Model Grading SystemJournal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, 2013
- Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot studyPharmaceutical Statistics, 2005
- Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading systemAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005
- Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: Is active retention needed?American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1992