Gerarda Buonocore
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Gerarda Buonocore has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ambra Michelotti
Section of Orthodontics, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Giorgio Oliva
Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, School of Orthodontics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Roberta Maddaluno
Independent Researcher, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Roberto Rongo
School of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Rosa Valletta
School of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication - Vincenzo D'''''Antò
Section of Orthodontics, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Dentistry Journal
- Vol. 14 (3) , 169
Difference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study
Background/Objectives: The achievement of stable and functional occlusal contacts represents a key objective of orthodontic treatment, particularly in growing patients. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities in establishing adequate occlusal contacts in growing patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare occlusal contact characteristics following clear aligner therapy (CAT) and fixed orthodontic therapy (FAT). Methods: Twenty-four growing patients (p < 0.05). Statistical difference was also observed in the antero-posterior ratio, with FAT presenting fewer anterior contacts in OCS, NOCS, half-mm, and one-mm measurements (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of left–right asymmetry or post-treatment single-tooth contacts, except for the second premolar, which exhibited higher contacts in the FAT group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Fixed orthodontic treatment is more effective than aligners in achieving adequate occlusal contacts, with differences limited to tight contacts and antero-posterior occlusal distribution.
- 13 March 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Dentistry Journal
- Vol. 14 (3) , 169
Open AccessDifference in Occlusal Contacts Obtained with Conventional Orthodontic and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Pilot Study
Background/Objectives: The achievement of stable and functional occlusal contacts represents a key objective of orthodontic treatment, particularly in growing patients. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two modalities in establishing adequate occlusal contacts in growing patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare occlusal contact characteristics following clear aligner therapy (CAT) and fixed orthodontic therapy (FAT). Methods: Twenty-four growing patients (p < 0.05). Statistical difference was also observed in the antero-posterior ratio, with FAT presenting fewer anterior contacts in OCS, NOCS, half-mm, and one-mm measurements (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of left–right asymmetry or post-treatment single-tooth contacts, except for the second premolar, which exhibited higher contacts in the FAT group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Fixed orthodontic treatment is more effective than aligners in achieving adequate occlusal contacts, with differences limited to tight contacts and antero-posterior occlusal distribution.