The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000

This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:

• A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?
  Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2011
• The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective
  Journal of Informetrics, 2011
• Evaluating University Research Performance Using Metrics
  European Political Science, 2011
• Scientific peer review
  Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011
• Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper
  Journal of Informetrics, 2010
• A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures
  PLOS ONE, 2009
• Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs
  PLOS ONE, 2009
• Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator c_f = c/c₀ at the micro level using data from chemistry
  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009
• Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008
• The numerical equivalence between the impact factor of journals and the quality of the articles
  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006