Vacuum births and barriers to its use: An observational study in governmental hospitals in Sierra Leone
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives Assisted vaginal births (AVD) can prevent unnecessary caesarean sections (CS). The number of CS is increasing rapidly in sub-Saharan Africa; these are still associated with high perioperative mortality rates. The aim of this study is to define the proportion of AVD in governmental hospitals in Sierra Leone and examine barriers to its use. Design Retrospective observational study of AVD between September 2016 and August 2017. Setting A representative selection of Sierra Leonean governmental hospitals (n=11). Participant and intervention (a) Data were collected from labour ward records. (b) Health workers involved in labour management were questioned. Primary and secondary outcome measures (a) Number of spontaneous, assisted vaginal and caesarean births. (b) Potential barriers to use vacuum-assisted births. Results (a) Total annual numbers of registered births, AVD and CS were 16 833, 631 (3.7%) and 4642 (27.6%). The proportion of vacuum births ranged from 0.0% to 5.1% across facilities. The proportion of CS ranged from 6.5% to 33.4%. (b) The most frequently reported reasons for limited vacuum use were lack of equipment (25/72; 35%) and insufficient training (18/72; 25%). Conclusions The proportion of AVD was particularly low in district facilities, and according to healthcare workers this was mostly due to lack of equipment and insufficient training. Implementing relevant training programmes on the use of vacuum devices and increasing the availability of working devices may increase the proportion of vacuum births in government hospitals in Sierra Leone. This could reduce the number of unnecessary CS.Keywords
Funding Information
- Norwegian Gynecological Association (Not applicable)
- Norwegian University of Sciences and Technology (Not applicable)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency GroupThe Lancet, 2016
- Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk‐stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro‐Peristat studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015
- WHO Statement on caesarean section ratesReproductive Health Matters, 2015
- Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013The Lancet, 2014
- Female Health and Family Planning in Sierra LeoneObstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
- Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal HealthBMC Medicine, 2010
- Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in AfricaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settingsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2009
- Ratio of instrumental vaginal delivery and caesarean section: A new indicator of the quality of obstetric careInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2000