Quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials in the hypospadias literature: Where do we stand?
Authors:
- 1 October 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Vol. 13 (5) , 482.e1-482.e9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of Reporting of Modern Randomized Controlled Trials in Medical Oncology: A Systematic ReviewJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2012
- Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric UrologyJournal of Urology, 2011
- Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in High-Quality Surgical JournalsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2009
- A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology LiteratureJournal of Urology, 2007
- Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Urology: Room for ImprovementJournal of Urology, 2006
- Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain TumorsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Quality of Abstracts Describing Randomized Trials in the Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology Meetings: Guidelines for Improved ReportingJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic QualityJAMA, 2002
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996