Applying the PROMETHEE II, WASPAS, and CoCoSo models for assessment of geotechnical hazards in TBM tunneling
Authors:
Open Access
- 2 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-19
Abstract
Mechanized tunneling in harsh environments faces many hazards, which can stop tunneling operations for a long time. Due to the high investment volume in tunneling projects, it is imperative to predict and assess the geotechnical hazards. This research has tried to evaluate and introduce the most dangerous section of the Kerman water conveyance tunnel (KWCT) using multi-index decision-making techniques including PROMETHEE II, WASPAS, and CoCoSo models. For this purpose, at first, the most important hazards in the tunnel route including dealing with fault zones, water inflow into the tunnel, rock abrasivity, and squeezing potential were identified. Then, the most dangerous sections of the tunnel were determined using empirical and analytical methods. In the next step, the weight of each criterion at most dangerous sections was determined using Shannon’s entropy method. The results showed that using PROMETHEE II, WASPAS, and CoCoSo models, section Hz11 of the tunnel is the most dangerous section among all sections from a geotechnical point of view. Finally, this study suggests the PROMETHEE II-entropy, WASPAS-entropy, and CoCoSo-entropy models as the suitable methods with more accuracy among MCDM techniques for evaluating the geotechnical and geological hazards in a real situation of tunneling projects.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the Efficiency of Pre-Grouting in Fault Zones of Tunnel and its Effect on Rock Mass Quality: A Case StudyGeotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2023
- Design of Effective Grouting Pattern in Kerman Water Conveyance Tunnel Using DFN-DEM and Analytical ApproachesInternational Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2023
- Evaluating the Efficiency of a New Cutterhead Design to Counteract the Drawbacks of Excavation through Very Hard RocksBHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte, 2021
- Assessment of risks of tunneling project in Iran using artificial bee colony algorithmSN Applied Sciences, 2019
- Geotechnical risk evaluation of tunneling projects using optimization techniques (case study: the second part of Emamzade Hashem tunnel)Natural Hazards, 2019
- Estimation of Rock Mass Squeezing Potential in Tunnel Route (Case Study: Kerman Water Conveyance Tunnel)Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2018
- Application of the Risk Matrix Method for Geotechnical Risk Analysis and Prediction of the Advance Rate in Rock TBM TunnelingRock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2013
- A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparisonsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2004
- Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass qualityTunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1992
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948