The performance of EuroSCORE II in CABG patients in relation to sex, age, and surgical risk: a nationwide study in 14,118 patients
Open Access
- 19 January 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Background: To determine the discriminative accuracy and calibration of EuroSCORE II in relation to age, sex, and surgical risk in a large nationwide coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) cohort. Methods: All 14,118 patients undergoing isolated CABG in Sweden during 2012–2017 were included. Individual patient data were taken from the SWEDEHEART registry. Patients were divided by age (< 60, 60–69, 70–79, ≥ 80 years), sex, and surgical risk (low: EuroSCORE < 4%, intermediate: 4–8%, high: > 8%). Discriminative accuracy was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration by the observed/estimated (O/E) mortality ratio at 30 days. Results: AUC and O/E ratio were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79–0.85) and 0.58 (0.50–0.66) overall, 0.82 (0.79–0.86) and 0.57 (0.48–0.66) in men, and 0.79 (0.73–0.85) and 0.60 (0.47–0.75) in women. Regarding age, discriminative accuracy was highest in patients aged 60–69 years (AUC: 0.86 [0.80–0.93]) but was satisfactory in all groups (AUC: 0.74–0.80). O/E ratio varied from 0.26 for patients > 60 years to 0.90 for patients > 80 years. Regarding surgical risk, AUC and O/E ratio were 0.63 (0.44–0.83) and 0.18 (0.09–0.30) in low-risk patients, 0.60 (0.55–0.66) and 0.57 (0.46–0.68) in intermediate-risk patients, and 0.78 (0.73–0.83) and 0.78 (0.64–0.92) in high-risk patients. Conclusions: EuroSCORE II had good discriminative accuracy independently of sex and age, but markedly overestimated mortality risk, especially in younger patients. Accuracy and calibration were better in high-risk patients than in low-risk and intermediate-risk patients.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Vetenskapsrådet (ALFGBG-942665)
- Local Research and Development Council Skaraborg (VGFOUSKB-964094)
- Skaraborg hospital research fund ((VGFOUSKAS-936367 , VGFOUSKAS-963405)
- Västra Götaland Regional Research Fund (VGFOUREG-940375)
- University of Gothenburg
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of EuroSCORE II, Original EuroSCORE, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score in Cardiac Surgery PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2016
- Consecutive Observational Study to Validate EuroSCORE II Performances on a Single-Center, Contemporary Cardiac Surgical CohortJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2016
- Performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II: A meta-analysis of 22 studies involving 145,592 cardiac surgery proceduresThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014
- The validity of the original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in patients over the age of seventyInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2014
- Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantationEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2014
- The new EuroSCORE II does not improve prediction of mortality in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a collaborative analysis of two European centresEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2013
- EuroSCORE IIEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient registerBMC Public Health, 2011
- The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)Heart, 2010
- Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgeryEuropean Heart Journal, 2006