Re-exploration for bleeding and long-term survival after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data
Authors:
- Giovanni Jr SolettiGSGiovanni Jr Soletti
- Gianmarco CancelliGCGianmarco Cancelli
- Tulio CaldonazoTCTulio Caldonazo
- Lamia HarikLHLamia Harik
- Camilla RossiCRCamilla Rossi
- Panagiotis TasoudisPanagiotis Tasoudis
- Jordan Bs LeithJLJordan Bs Leith
- Kevin R. AnKAKevin R. An
- Arnaldo DimagliADArnaldo Dimagli
- Michelle Mlis DemetresMDMichelle Mlis Demetres
- Mario GaudinoMGMario Gaudino
Open Access
- 7 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 110 (9) , 5795-5801
Abstract
Background: Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is a serious complication that occurs in 2.8–4.6% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Re-exploration has previously been associated with a higher risk of short-term mortality. However, a comprehensive analysis of long-term outcomes after re-exploration for bleeding has not been published. Materials and methods: The authors performed a systematic, three databases search to identify studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients who required re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery compared to patients who did not, with at least 1-year of follow-up. Long-term survival was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and hospital length of stay. Random-effects models was used. Individual patient survival data was extracted from available survival curves and reconstructed using restricted mean survival time. Results: Six studies totaling 135 456 patients were included. The average follow-up was 5.5 years. In the individual patient data, patients who required re-exploration had a significantly higher risk of death compared with patients who did not [hazard ratio (HR): 1.21; 95% CI: 1.14–1.27; PPPPPPPP=0.0007). Conclusion: Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is associated with lower long-term survival and increased risk of short-term adverse events including operative mortality, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and longer hospital length of stay. To improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, strategies to prevent the need for re-exploration are necessary.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term Outcome of Reexploration for Bleeding After Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2023
- Long-term outcome of patients undergoing re-exploration for bleeding following cardiac surgery: a SWEDEHEART studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2022
- Impact of postoperative complications after cardiac surgery on long‐term survivalJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2021
- Long-Term Outcomes of Reoperation for Bleeding After Cardiac SurgerySeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2021
- Reoperation for bleeding following coronary artery bypass surgery with special focus on long-term outcomesScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 2020
- In-hospital and mid-term outcomes in patients reoperated on due to bleeding following coronary artery surgery (from the KROK Registry)Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2019
- Meta-analysis of the Sources of Bleeding after Adult Cardiac SurgeryJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2018
- 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgeryJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2018
- Reconstructing Time-to-event Data from Published Kaplan–Meier CurvesThe Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 2017
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothBMJ, 2017