LHLamia Harik

Lamia Harik

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Lamia Harik has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Re-exploration for bleeding and long-term survival after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data

    by Giovanni Jr Soletti, Gianmarco Cancelli, Michele Bs Dell’aquila, Tulio Caldonazo, Lamia Harik, Camilla Rossi, Panagiotis Tasoudis, Jordan Bs Leith, Kevin R. An, Arnaldo Dimagli, et al.

    Background: Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is a serious complication that occurs in 2.8–4.6% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Re-exploration has previously been associated with a higher risk of short-term mortality. However, a comprehensive analysis of long-term outcomes after re-exploration for bleeding has not been published. Materials and methods: The authors performed a systematic, three databases search to identify studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients who required re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery compared to patients who did not, with at least 1-year of follow-up. Long-term survival was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and hospital length of stay. Random-effects models was used. Individual patient survival data was extracted from available survival curves and reconstructed using restricted mean survival time. Results: Six studies totaling 135 456 patients were included. The average follow-up was 5.5 years. In the individual patient data, patients who required re-exploration had a significantly higher risk of death compared with patients who did not [hazard ratio (HR): 1.21; 95% CI: 1.14–1.27; PPPPPPPP=0.0007). Conclusion: Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration is associated with lower long-term survival and increased risk of short-term adverse events including operative mortality, stroke, renal and respiratory complications, and longer hospital length of stay. To improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, strategies to prevent the need for re-exploration are necessary.


  • Open Access

    External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    by Giovanni Jr Soletti, Arnaldo Dimagli, Lamia Harik, Gianmarco Cancelli, Roberto Perezgrovas-Olaria, Talal Alzghari, Michele Dell’aquila, Jordan Leith, Sabrina Castagnini, Christopher Lau, et al.

    The external stenting of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been proven to reduce intimal hyperplasia (IH) in animal models, paving the way for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be conducted. Herein, we performed a study-level meta-analysis to assess the impact of the Venous External SupporT (VEST) device, an external stent, on the outcomes of SVGs. A systematic search was conducted to identify all RCTs comparing VEST-stented to non-stented SVGs in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was graft occlusion. The main secondary outcomes were repeat revascularization, SVG IH area, and intimal-medial thickness. Two RCTs totaling 407 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, there was no difference in graft occlusion between groups (incidence rate ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–1.53). The rate of repeat revascularization was also similar (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27–1.64). The IH area (standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.45; 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.10) and intimal-medial thickness (SMD: −0.50; 95% CI: −0.90 to −0.10) were significantly reduced in the VEST group. Our findings show that significant reductions in the IH area and the intimal-medial thickness in VEST-stented SVGs do not currently translate into a lesser need for repeat revascularization or less graft occlusion events compared to non-stented SVGs at 1.5 years after CABG.


  • Open Access

    The VEST External Support for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

    by Giovanni Jr. Soletti, Michele Dell’aquila, Lamia Harik, Gianmarco Cancelli, Talal Alzghari, Roberto Perezgrovas-Olaria, Arnaldo Dimagli, Kevin R. An, Jordan Leith, Camilla Sofia Rossi, et al.

    Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are the most frequently used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but their higher rate of occlusion compared to arterial conduits remains a concern. Previous studies have shown that SVG failure is mainly driven by intimal hyperplasia, an adaptative response to higher pressures of the arterial circulation. The VESTTM device (Vascular Graft Solutions, Tel Aviv, Israel), an external support designed to mitigate intimal hyperplasia in SVGs, has been tested in few clinical trials (RCTs). Herein, we descriptively evaluated the randomized evidence on the VEST device.


  • Open Access

    Angiographic Outcomes for Arterial and Venous Conduits Used in CABG

    by Arnaldo Dimagli, Giovanni Soletti, Lamia Harik, Roberto Perezgrovas Olaria, Gianmarco Cancelli, Kevin R. An, Talal Alzghari, Charles Mack, Mario Gaudino

    Coronary artery bypass grafting is the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure. Conduit selection is crucial to achieving early optimal outcomes, with graft patency being likely the main driver to long-term survival. We present a review of current evidence on the patency of arterial and venous bypass conduits and of differences in angiographic outcomes.