Identifying Stakeholder Values for an eHealth Intervention to Facilitate Home-Based Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Multi-Method Approach
Open Access
- 11 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
- Vol. 62
Abstract
Despite the existing need for an integrated eHealth intervention for home-based geriatric rehabilitation, it has never, to our knowledge, been developed through co-creation with the stakeholders. This study aims to identify values (based on stakeholders’ needs and preferences) regarding an eHealth intervention that fits the context of home-based geriatric rehabilitation. The multi-method qualitative design of this study comprised multiple qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews, and brainstorming sessions) and a survey. An agile science approach allowed for iterative data collection and analysis until an optimal fit was achieved. Recommendations from The Center of eHealth Research and Disease Management (CeHRes) Roadmap were used. Fourteen key stakeholders were identified, seven of which were represented in a project team that co-created the steps of this research. Based on the results of the qualitative methods, 15 eHealth attributes were formulated that captured the needs or preferences of the stakeholders. These resulted in the formulation of seven stakeholder values: (1) Fit with the patient’s digital skills and needs, (2) Blended care, (3) Personalized, (4) Safety at home, (5) Affordability, (6) Support, and (7) Privacy. Co-creation with stakeholders is necessary for the development of eHealth interventions in home-based geriatric rehabilitation. The most prominent key stakeholder is the patient. eHealth should match with the digital skills of the patient and preferably be delivered as blended care. The formulated values should be incorporated in future development of eHealth interventions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Zorgondersteuningsfonds (PROM-16)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical outcomes of remote asynchronous telerehabilitation are equivalent to traditional therapy following total knee arthroplasty: A randomized control studyJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2016
- Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholdersAntimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 2016
- Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysisClinical Rehabilitation, 2016
- Mixing Online and Face-to-Face Therapy: How to Benefit From Blended Care in Mental Health CareJMIR Mental Health, 2016
- mActive: A Randomized Clinical Trial of an Automated mHealth Intervention for Physical Activity PromotionJournal of the American Heart Association, 2015
- Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development ApproachJMIR Research Protocols, 2013
- A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth TechnologiesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Hospitalization-Associated DisabilityJAMA, 2011
- Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2010
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007