Consenting to Sexual Activity: The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Dual Measures of Consent
- 23 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of Sexual Behavior
- Vol. 43 (3) , 437-450
Abstract
Sexual assault prevention efforts have focused on educating students to obtain consent as a mechanism to reduce sexual assault, yet little is known about how college students consent to sex. Additionally, there are currently no measures available to assess students’ consent to sex. The current study aimed to better understand college students consent by using a systematic approach to develop validated measures of sexual consent. This study integrated mixed methods via three phases and two waves of data collection to develop two measures of consent. In Phase 1, qualitative data were collected from college students (n = 185) to inform the design of quantitative measures aimed at assessing sexual consent at last sexual intercourse. In Phase 2, items were written for the closed-ended quantitative instrument and reviewed by a team of experts, educators, and clinicians. In Phase 3, a quantitative survey was administered to college students (n = 660) which included the measures of consent developed from the Phase 1 data; the measures were assessed for their psychometric properties. Exploratory factor analyses were utilized to assess the measures and resulted in five factors each for both consent scales. Both scales had high internal consistency reliability, showed gender differences, and showed differences across relationship status (single vs. in a relationship). The two newly developed measures assess unique constructs of consent and demonstrate assessments of specific concepts. Our findings provide an important contribution to the field of sexuality as these measures can be used in future research to better understand sexual consent.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of Sexual Victimization Prevention Among College Students: A Summary of “What Works”Victims & Offenders, 2009
- The Violent and Sexual Victimization of College WomenJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2008
- Predicting Men's Rape Perceptions Based on the Belief That “No” Really Means “Yes”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2003
- “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situationsThe Journal of Sex Research, 1999
- Rape Myth Acceptance: Exploration of Its Structure and Its Measurement Using theIllinois Rape Myth Acceptance ScaleJournal of Research in Personality, 1999
- Gender Differences in Responses to Discrepancies in Desired Level of Sexual IntimacyInternational Journal of Sexual Health, 1996
- Tactics for promoting sexual encountersThe Journal of Sex Research, 1994
- Definitions of Rape: Scientific and Political ImplicationsJournal of Social Issues, 1992
- Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987
- Is Date Rape Justifiable?: The Effects of Dating Activity, Who Initiated, Who Paid, and Men's Attitudes toward WomenPsychology of Women Quarterly, 1985