Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery

This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:

• Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement
  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007
• Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement
  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2005
• Exploring the Factorial Validity and Clinical Interpretability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
  Physiotherapy Canada, 2003
• Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty
  Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2001
• The minimal important difference: Who's to say what is important?
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
• A Double-Blind Study of 250 Cases Comparing Cemented With Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
  Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1994
• Measurement of health status
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1989
• Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems
  Science, 1988
• A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee
  Clinical Rheumatology, 1986
• Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance
  Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1986