What is the appropriate gold standard test for refractive error?

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

• The good (logMAR), the bad (Snellen) and the ugly (BCVA, number of letters read) of visual acuity measurement
  Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2016
• Clinical evaluation of the Shin‐Nippon SRW ‐5000 autorefractor in adults: an update
  Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2015
• Comparison of four different binocular balancing techniques
  Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 2014
• Visual acuity changes in cone and cone‐rod dystrophies
  Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2011
• The Development of an Instrument to Measure Quality of Vision: The Quality of Vision (QoV) Questionnaire
  Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2010
• A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction With and Without Cycloplegia in Primary School Children
  American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2006
• Clinical Evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor
  Optometry and Vision Science, 2003
• The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptance
  Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2001
• Will the auto‐refractor ever replace the optometrist?
  Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2000
• Clinical evaluation of patient tolerance to autorefractor prescriptions
  Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 1998