Natural frequencies facilitate diagnostic inferences of managers
Authors:
Open Access
- 22 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 6, 642
Abstract
In Bayesian inference tasks, information about base rates as well as hit rate and false-alarm rate needs to be integrated according to Bayes’ rule after the result of a diagnostic test became known. Numerous studies have found that presenting information in a Bayesian inference task in terms of natural frequencies leads to better performance compared to variants with information presented in terms of probabilities or percentages. Natural frequencies are the tallies in a natural sample in which hit rate and false-alarm rate are not normalized with respect to base rates. The present research replicates the beneficial effect of natural frequencies with four tasks from the domain of management, and with management students as well as experienced executives as participants. The percentage of Bayesian responses was almost twice as high when information was presented in natural frequencies compared to a presentation in terms of percentages. In contrast to most tasks previously studied, the majority of numerical responses were lower than the Bayesian solutions. Having heard of Bayes’ rule prior to the study did not affect Bayesian performance. An implication of our work is that textbooks explaining Bayes’ rule should teach how to represent information in terms of natural frequencies instead of how to plug probabilities or percentages into a formula.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacyQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012
- Communicating Data About the Benefits and Harms of TreatmentAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductionsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- The role of representation in Bayesian reasoning: Correcting common misconceptionsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007
- Teaching Bayesian reasoning: an evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical studentsMedical Teacher, 2002
- On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky.Psychological Review, 1996
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review, 1995
- Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities1982
- The base-rate fallacy in probability judgmentsActa Psychologica, 1980
- Subjective probability: A judgment of representativenessCognitive Psychology, 1972