Prenatal Exome Sequencing Analysis in Fetuses With Structural Anomalies: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study With Practical Implications
Open Access
- 17 October 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 46 (1) , 46-55
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of prenatal exome sequencing (ES) integrated with copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis (ES‐CNV/SNV) in fetuses with structural anomalies following negative chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping, and to delineate the practical challenges encountered during its clinical implementation in prenatal settings. Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort study (2018–2021), 275 fetuses with structural anomalies were categorized into three groups: sporadic single‐system ( n = 128), sporadic multisystem ( n = 88), and recurrent anomalies ( n = 59). Trio‐based ES‐CNV/SNV analysis was used to identify SNVs, CNVs, or compound heterozygous CNV/SNV combinations— the latter being defined as two distinct pathogenic variants (a CNV and an SNV) coexisting within the same gene, resulting in biallelic gene dysfunction, which is pivotal for autosomal recessive disorders. Incremental diagnostic yields across groups, the incidence of CNV/SNV combinations, and expanded prenatal phenotypic‐genotypic correlations were analyzed. Results: ES‐CNV/SNV analysis improved the diagnostic yield to 29.45% (81/275) compared with conventional chromosome analysis combined with CMA in fetuses with malformations. The highest diagnostic yield was observed in the recurrent anomaly group (40.68%, 24/59), followed by the multisystem (28.41%, 25/88) and single‐system anomaly groups (25.00%, 32/128). Notably, 1.45% of cases harbored compound CNV/SNV combinations, underscoring the diagnostic potential of ES‐CNV/SNV in autosomal recessive disorders. In addition, this study expanded prenatal phenotypic‐genotypic correlations for 36 variants and five genes. Conclusion: ES‐CNV/SNV analysis enhances prenatal diagnostic precision by detecting compound CNV/SNV combinations that are undetectable by standard testing. Recurrent anomalies demonstrated a greater diagnostic benefit than sporadic single‐system or multisystem anomalies, underscoring the utility of this method in high‐risk cases. This study broadens the prenatal phenotypic spectrum and deepens our understanding of developmental mechanisms.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC1005300)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC1005301)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exome Sequencing of Fetuses With Intracranial Hemorrhage Unravels Novel Causative Genes and an Extreme Genetic HeterogeneityPrenatal Diagnosis, 2025
- Whole Exome Sequencing in a Population of Fetuses With Structural AnomaliesPrenatal Diagnosis, 2025
- The incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing over chromosome microarray for congenital heart abnormalities: A systematic review and meta‐analysisPrenatal Diagnosis, 2024
- All‐in‐one whole exome sequencing strategy with simultaneous copy number variant, single nucleotide variant and absence‐of‐heterozygosity analysis in fetuses with structural ultrasound anomalies: A 1‐year experiencePrenatal Diagnosis, 2023
- Prenatal phenotyping: A community effort to enhance the Human Phenotype OntologyAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 2022
- Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta‐analysisUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2022
- Trio‐whole‐exome sequencing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for unexplained recurrent fetal malformationsHuman Mutation, 2019
- Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencingPrenatal Diagnosis, 2017
- Molecular Findings Among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome SequencingJAMA, 2014
- The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literaturePrenatal Diagnosis, 2013