Unreliable numbers: error and harm induced by bad design can be reduced by better design
Open Access
- 6 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Vol. 12 (110) , 20150685
Abstract
Number entry is a ubiquitous activity and is often performed in safety- and mission-critical procedures, such as healthcare, science, finance, aviation and in many other areas. We show that Monte Carlo methods can quickly and easily compare the reliability of different number entry systems. A surprising finding is that many common, widely used systems are defective, and induce unnecessary human error. We show that Monte Carlo methods enable designers to explore the implications of normal and unexpected operator behaviour, and to design systems to be more resilient to use error. We demonstrate novel designs with improved resilience, implying that the common problems identified and the errors they induce are avoidable.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making healthcare safer by understanding, designing and buying better ITClinical Medicine, 2015
- Safer User Interfaces: A Case Study in Improving Number EntryIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2014
- AAAS news and notesScience, 2014
- Academic freedom under threatNature, 2014
- Formal Verification of Medical Device User Interfaces Using PVSLecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014
- Liability Claims and Costs Before and After Implementation of a Medical Error Disclosure ProgramAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Reducing number entry errors: solving a widespread, serious problemJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2010
- Interaction Walkthrough: Evaluation of Safety Critical Interactive Systems2007
- Usability analysis with Markov modelsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2001
- Calculators are needlessly badInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2000