Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?
Open Access
- 2 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 23 (2) , 333-338
Abstract
Objective To assess whether integrating critical result management software—Alert Notification of Critical Results (ANCR)—with an electronic health record (EHR)-based results management application impacts closed-loop communication and follow-up of nonurgent, clinically significant radiology results by primary care providers (PCPs). Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved study was conducted at a large academic medical center. Postintervention, PCPs could acknowledge nonurgent, clinically significant ANCR-generated alerts (“alerts”) within ANCR or the EHR. Primary outcome was the proportion of alerts acknowledged via EHR over a 24-month postintervention. Chart abstractions for a random sample of alerts 12 months preintervention and 24 months postintervention were reviewed, and the follow-up rate of actionable alerts (eg, performing follow-up imaging, administering antibiotics) was estimated. Pre- and postintervention rates were compared using the Fisher exact test. Postintervention follow-up rate was compared for EHR-acknowledged alerts vs ANCR. Results Five thousand nine hundred and thirty-one alerts were acknowledged by 171 PCPs, with 100% acknowledgement (consistent with expected ANCR functionality). PCPs acknowledged 16% (688 of 4428) of postintervention alerts in the EHR, with the remaining in ANCR. Follow-up was documented for 85 of 90 (94%; 95% CI, 88%-98%) preintervention and 79 of 84 (94%; 95% CI, 87%-97%) postintervention alerts ( P > .99). Postintervention, 11 of 14 (79%; 95% CI, 52%-92%) alerts were acknowledged via EHR and 68 of 70 (97%; 95% CI, 90%-99%) in ANCR had follow-up ( P = .03). Conclusions Integrating ANCR and EHR provides an additional workflow for acknowledging nonurgent, clinically significant results without significant change in rates of closed-loop communication or follow-up of alerts.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linking acknowledgement to action: closing the loop on non-urgent, clinically significant test results in the electronic health recordJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2015
- Four-Year Impact of an Alert Notification System on Closed-Loop Communication of Critical Test ResultsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2014
- Communication of Unexpected and Significant Findings on Chest Radiographs With an Automated PACS Alert SystemJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2014
- Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.2014
- An Initiative to Improve the Management of Clinically Significant Test Results in a Large Health Care NetworkThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2013
- Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital dischargeJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2010
- Launching HITECHNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Optimizing Communication of Critical Test ResultsJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2009
- Important Imaging Finding E-mail Alert System: Experience after 3 Years of ImplementationRadiology, 2009
- Efficiency of a Semiautomated Coding and Review Process for Notification of Critical Findings in Diagnostic ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2006