Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science
- 30 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Synthese
- Vol. 196 (10) , 3915-3932
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Survey on Data Reproducibility in Cancer Research Provides Insights into Our Limited Ability to Translate Findings from the Laboratory to the ClinicPLOS ONE, 2013
- Bias in peer reviewJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012
- Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practicesResearch Evaluation, 2012
- The Epistemic Benefit of Transient DiversityErkenntnis, 2009
- Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?Philosophy of Science, 2001
- New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review SystemScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1991
- Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To ItScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- Innovation and Scientific FundingScience, 1980
- A New and Searching Look at NSFScience, 1979
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977