Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis
Authors:
- Marybeth NedrudMNMarybeth Nedrud
- Tanya WolfsonTWTanya Wolfson
- Brian AllenBABrian Allen
- Anum AslamAAAnum Aslam
- Lauren BurkeLBLauren Burke
- Victoria ChernyakVCVictoria Chernyak
- Kathryn FowlerKFKathryn Fowler
- Tyler J. FraumTFTyler J. Fraum
- Hong-Il HaHHHong-Il Ha
- Elizabeth M. HechtEHElizabeth M. Hecht
- Tracy JaffeTJTracy Jaffe
- Kevin KaliszKKKevin Kalisz
- 28 April 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 50 (11) , 5232-5241
Abstract
Purpose The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) provides a framework for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, LR-5). However, not all HCCs meet LR-5 criteria and are instead categorized as LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not specific for HCC, necessitating biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose is to identify factors associated with HCC in LR-M observations. Methods This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of participants from 8 institutions that had a LR-M observation on CT or MRI with corresponding histopathologic diagnosis. Demographics and biochemical data were examined. Central review using the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm was performed. Kappa statistics defined inter-reader agreement. Random forest and logistic regression analyses generated a model for HCC diagnosis. Results 162 participants with 162 LR-M observations were included. 46% of observations (74/162) were HCC and 37% were cholangiocarcinoma (60/162). Two of 34 imaging features– observation size and intra-lesion iron– showed moderate to strong inter-reader agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.60) while the remainder showed weak or no agreement (Kappa < 0.60). Random forest analysis showed biochemical features to be more predictive of HCC than imaging features. Logistic regression analysis of a model based on INR and AFP provided a 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for HCC by Youden’s index and a 90% specificity threshold yielded 38% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value, and 66% negative predictive value. Conclusions Our results show INR and AFP are associated with HCC in LR-M observations. A high-specificity threshold may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in the appropriate setting. Summary statement In certain at-risk patients with a LR-M observation on diagnostic imaging, serum AFP and INR maybe useful tools for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing Survival Outcomes of Patients With LI‐RADS‐M Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Intrahepatic CholangiocarcinomasJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2022
- An assessment of liver lesions using a combination of CEUS LI-RADS and AFPAbdominal Radiology, 2022
- Diagnostic Criteria and LI‐RADS for Hepatocellular CarcinomaClinical Liver Disease, 2021
- Interreader Agreement of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2020
- Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteriaHPB, 2019
- Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysisGastroenterology, 2018
- Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver DiseasesHepatology, 2018
- LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinomaAbdominal Radiology, 2017
- AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomaHepatology, 2017
- Random ForestsMachine Learning, 2001