Meat Analog Products: Current Worldwide Scenario and Future Perspectives in Consumption and Regulation
Authors:
- Tatiana Barbieri CochlarTCTatiana Barbieri Cochlar
- Ziane da Conceição das MercêsZMZiane da Conceição das Mercês
- Natalia Maldaner SalvadoriNSNatalia Maldaner Salvadori
- Sabrina Melo EvangelistaSESabrina Melo Evangelista
- Virgílio José StrasburgVSVirgílio José Strasburg
- Viviani Ruffo de OliveiraViviani Ruffo de Oliveira
Open Access
Abstract
Interest in plant-based diets has grown expressively in different regions of the world. However, the missing regulation for meat analogs may mislead consumers by suggesting that these products are the same as the meat they are replacing. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the current global scenario of meat analogs, discuss consumption changes and their regulation, as well as pointing out future perspectives for the sector. A narrative literature review was performed using scientific papers from the Virtual Health Library (BVS), LILACS, PubMed (NIH), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and official documents. Included studies were aligned with the research theme, concentrating on countries with regulations for plant-based analog products and those lacking or pursuing such regulations. Additionally, studies were selected based on the following criteria: original or review studies from different countries, papers discussing meat analogs in terms of consumption, sensory attributes, market dynamics, sustainability, regulation, food safety; availability of full text; and publication dates ranging from 2015 to 2025. The data reveals that most of the assessed nations still lack specific regulations for meat analog products, adopting general labeling and naming standards that range from flexible approaches to strict restrictions. To conclude, the article highlights that meat substitutes are emerging as promising and sustainable options; however, their true consolidation is conditioned on the existence of more defined regulatory frameworks, increased consumer confidence, and market conditions that favor their large-scale adoption.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (24/2551-0001508-6)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where are we now with meat alternatives? Global insights and strategic lessons for UK's net-zero goals through agri-food system transitionCleaner Food Systems, 2025
- Familiarity and satisfaction with plant-based meat alternatives around the worldFuture Foods, 2025
- Review: Will “cultured meat” transform our food system towards more sustainability?Animal, 2024
- Eco-efficiency and demand of enteral diets used in patients of a Brazilian public hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemicEnvironment, Development and Sustainability, 2024
- “I guess it's quite trendy”: A qualitative insight into young meat-eaters’ sustainable food consumption habits and perceptions towards current and future protein alternativesAppetite, 2023
- Policy Insights from High-Income Countries to Guide Safe, Nutritious, and Sustainable Alternative Proteins for Low- and Middle-Income CountriesCurrent Developments in Nutrition, 2023
- Gradual behaviour change towards meat reduction: Development and validation of a novel decisional balance scaleAppetite, 2023
- Would you buy vegan meatballs? The policy issues around vegan and meat-sounding labelling of plant-based meat alternativesFood Policy, 2022
- Plant-based meat analogs: A review with reference to formulation and gastrointestinal fateCurrent Research in Food Science, 2022
- Alternative proteins and EU food lawFood Control, 2021