Digital Transformation in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Acceptability of Blended Learning
Authors:
- Andreas Michael WeimerAWAndreas Michael Weimer
- Rainer BertholdRBRainer Berthold
- Christian SchambergerCSChristian Schamberger
- Thomas ViethTVThomas Vieth
- Gerd BalserGBGerd Balser
- Svenja BertholdSBSvenja Berthold
- Stephan SteinSSStephan Stein
- Lukas MüllerLMLukas Müller
- Daniel MerkelDMDaniel Merkel
- Florian ReckerFlorian Recker
- Gerhard SchmidmaierGSGerhard Schmidmaier
- Maximilian RinkMRMaximilian Rink
Open Access
- 20 October 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 13 (20) , 3272
Abstract
Background: ultrasound diagnostics have a broad spectrum of applications, including among diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Accordingly, it is important for the users to have a well-founded and up-to-date education in this dynamic examination method. The right balance between online and in-class teaching still needs to be explored in this context. Certifying institutions are currently testing digitally transformed teaching concepts to provide more evidence. Methods: this study compared two musculoskeletal ultrasound blended learning models. Model A was more traditional, with a focus on in-person teaching, while Model B was more digitally oriented with compulsory webinar. Both used e-learning for preparation. Participants completed evaluations using a seven-point Likert scale, later converted to a 0–1 scale. Digital teaching media (e-learning) were used for preparation in both courses. Results: the analysis included n = 41 evaluations for Model A and n = 30 for Model B. Model B received a better overall assessment (median: 0.73 vs. 0.69, p = 0.05). Model B also excelled in “course preparation” (p = 0.02), “webinar quality” (p = 0.04), and “course concept” (p = 0.04). The “gain of competence” (p = 0.82), “learning materials” (p = 0.30), and “tutor quality” (p = 0.28) showed no significant differences. Conclusion: participants favorably assessed blended learning in ultrasound teaching. Certifying institutions should consider accrediting models that combine digital methods (e.g., internet lectures/webinars) and materials (e.g., e-learning) with hands-on ultrasound training. Further research is needed to validate these subjective findings for a stronger evidential basis.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of case-based e-learning on students’ performance in point-of-care ultrasound courses: a randomized trialEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2016
- Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the “sandwich e-learning” approach. A randomized trialThe Ultrasound Journal, 2016
- Blended Learning Improves Science EducationCell, 2015
- Welche Lehrmethoden werden für die Ultraschallausbildung erwartet?Der Anaesthesist, 2014
- Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual frameworkThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2012
- Using Web 2.0 Technologies to Enhance Evidence-Based Medical InformationJournal of Health Communication, 2011
- Blended learning in radiology: Is self-determined learning really more effective?European Journal of Radiology, 2011
- Trauma musculoskeletal ultrasoundEmergency Radiology, 2008
- The Impact of E-Learning in Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2006
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound—a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 1: Current controversies and issues in the development of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatologyRheumatology, 2004