Screw Fixation Compared with Suture-Button Fixation of Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 91 (5) , 1143-1148
Abstract
Background: A cannulated screw is currently used to reduce and stabilize diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. The screw requires removal and may break in situ. A suture button does not have these disadvantages, but it is not known if it can provide stability similar to that provided by a cannulated screw or an intact Lisfranc ligament. The objective of the present study was to compare the stability provided by a suture button with that provided by a screw when used to stabilize the diastasis associated with Lisfranc ligament injury. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the dorsal region. A registration marker triad consisting of three screws was fixed to the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the registration markers and their displacement in test conditions before and after cutting of the Lisfranc ligament and after stabilization of the joint with either a suture button or a cannulated screw. The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the ligament attachment sites were digitized. Displacement at the Lisfranc ligament and the three-dimensional positions of the bones were determined. Results: Loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in displacement that was significantly different from that after screw fixation (p = 0.0001), with a difference between means of 1.2 mm. Likewise, loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in a displacement that was significantly different from that after suture-button fixation (p = 0.0008), with a difference between means of 1.00 mm. No significant difference in displacement was found between specimens fixed with the suture button and those fixed with the screw. Conclusions: Suture-button fixation can provide stability similar to that provided by screw fixation in cadaver specimens after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Clinical Relevance: Fixation with a suture button may be an acceptable alternative to screw fixation in the treatment of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, avoiding subsequent surgery to remove the hardware prior to weight-bearing.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determination of rigid body registration marker error from edge errorJournal of Biomechanics, 2009
- A Minimally Disruptive Model and Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Lisfranc Joint DiastasisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Extraarticular Stabilization of Lisfranc InjuryTechniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2008
- Practical Management of Lisfranc Injuries in AthletesClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2007
- Treatment of Primarily Ligamentous Lisfranc Joint Injuries: Primary Arthrodesis Compared with Open Reduction and Internal FixationA Prospective, Randomized StudyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2006
- Ankle Syndesmosis InjuriesFoot and Ankle Clinics, 2006
- Abduction Stress and AP Weightbearing Radiography of Purely Ligamentous Injury in the Tarsometatarsal JointFoot & Ankle International, 1998
- Lisfranc Fracture-Dislocation: A Frequently Missed Diagnosis in the Emergency DepartmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Rupture of Lisfranc's Ligament in Athletes*The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994
- Repair of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis with a Flexible ImplantJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1991