Consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change: insights from nationally representative surveys across four European countries
- 4 May 2018
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Risk Research
- Vol. 22 (5) , 610-626
Abstract
This paper examines consequence evaluations and moral concerns about climate change across four European countries. Data from nationally representative samples (each n > 1000) were analysed in order to explore the relative importance of consequences versus morality in explaining public support for different climate policies. Most respondents expected climate change to have largely negative consequences for their respective country. Climate change consequences were viewed most negatively in Germany, followed by France, the U.K. and Norway. While the vast majority of respondents expressed at least some degree of moral concern about climate change, a notable minority in each sample stated that they have no such concerns. Moral concerns were highest in France, followed by the U.K. and Norway, and lowest in Germany. It was found that both judgements explain support for policies that aim to mitigate climate change or aim to adapt to the impacts of climate change. However, our results further suggest that moral concern was a stronger predictor of policy support than consequence evaluations. If at all, consequence evaluations were more likely to predict policy support in Germany and Norway than in the U.K. and France. Overall, policies that involved subsidies received the strongest support, whereas policies involving individual costs received the least support. This research broadens our understanding of the intertwining between risk perceptions and public support for climate policies, documenting variability across and within countries. Implications for policy-makers with an interest in communicating climate change risks to the broader public audience are discussed.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-JCLI-0003)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M009505/1)
- Norges Forskningsråd (244904)
- Akademiaavtale (803589)
- economic & social research council (ES/M009505/1)
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01UV1403)
- Universitetet i Bergen (803589)
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intention to act towards a local hydrogen refueling facility: Moral considerations versus self-interestTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013
- Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’?Global Environmental Change, 2011
- General Antecedents of Personal Norms, Policy Acceptability, and Intentions: The Role of Values, Worldviews, and Environmental ConcernSociety & Natural Resources, 2010
- Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policiesGlobal Environmental Change, 2010
- Morality and Climate Change: Is Leaving your TV on Standby a Risky Behaviour?Environmental Values, 2010
- Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality?Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2009
- Estimators of Relative Importance in Linear Regression Based on Variance DecompositionThe American Statistician, 2007
- Climate Change Vulnerability and Policy SupportSociety & Natural Resources, 2006
- Mental representation of global environmental risks2005
- Will Public Environmental Concern Lead to Action on Global Warming?Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1993