Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B‐Path study
- 11 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 69 (6) , 1028-1046
Abstract
Aims: This study examined the case‐specific characteristics associated with interobserver diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) of the breast.Methods and results: Seventy‐two test set cases with a consensus diagnosis of ADH from the B‐Path study were evaluated. Cases were scored for 17 histological features, which were then correlated with the participant agreement with the consensus ADH diagnosis. Participating pathologists’ perceptions of case difficulty, borderline features or whether they would obtain a second opinion were also examined for associations with agreement. Of the 2070 participant interpretations of the 72 consensus ADH cases, 48% were scored by participants as difficult and 45% as borderline between two diagnoses; the presence of both of these features was significantly associated with increased agreement (P < 0.001). A second opinion would have been obtained in 80% of interpretations, and this was associated with increased agreement (P < 0.001). Diagnostic agreement ranged from 10% to 89% on a case‐by‐case basis. Cases with papillary lesions, cribriform architecture and obvious cytological monotony were associated with higher agreement. Lower agreement rates were associated with solid or micropapillary architecture, borderline cytological monotony, or cases without a diagnostic area that was obvious on low power.Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that pathologists frequently recognize the challenge of ADH cases, with some cases being more prone to diagnostic variability. In addition, there are specific histological features associated with diagnostic agreement on ADH cases. Multiple example images from cases in this test set are provided to serve as educational illustrations of these challenges.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01 CA140560, R01 CA172343)
- National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201100031C)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic reproducibility of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: a multicentre, multinational study using virtual microscopyHistopathology, 2012
- Concordance between local, institutional, and central pathology review in glioblastoma: Implications for research and practice: A pilot studyNeurology India, 2012
- Atypical ductal hyperplasia: interobserver and intraobserver variabilityLaboratory Investigation, 2011
- Interobserver variability of laryngeal mucosal premalignant lesions: a histopathological evaluationLaboratory Investigation, 2011
- Discrepancies in the diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and its management implications: results of a multinational surveyVirchows Archiv, 2006
- Interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of malt/malt lymphoma: towards a consensusBlood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, 2005
- Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breastEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Hyperplastic Ductal and Lobular Lesions and Carcinomas In Situ of the Breast: Reproducibility of Current Diagnostic Criteria Among Community- and Academic-Based PathologistsThe Breast Journal, 1998
- Reproducibility of histological diagnosis of breast lesions: Results of a panel in ItalyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1996
- Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: Findings of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemeEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1994