Real-World Safety of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Sensor Over Multiple Cycles of Use: A Post-Market Registry Study
Open Access
- 2 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 22 (1) , 48-52
Abstract
Previously, the safety and accuracy of the Eversense continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system were characterized in three pivotal trials among individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a single 90- or 180-day sensor insertion–removal cycle. The Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) registry is a prospective study evaluating the long-term safety and performance of the Eversense CGM system over multiple sensor insertion–removal cycles among adults with T1D and T2D. All patients who had a sensor subcutaneously implanted across 534 participating centers in Europe and South Africa from June 2016 to August 2018 were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at each visit and patients were instructed to inform their clinic if they experienced any AEs between visits. AEs were adjudicated for relatedness to the device, procedure, or drug (dexamethasone acetate). The primary safety endpoint was the rate of related serious adverse events (SAEs) through four sensor insertion–removal cycles. The registry enrolled 3023 patients. As of last follow-up, 5417 sensors had been inserted with a total of 1260 patient-years (PYs) of follow-up: 969 patients had used the system for at least 6 months and 173 patients had used the system for at least 1 year. No related SAEs were reported. The most frequently reported related AEs were sensor location site infection (0.96%; 2.46 events per 100 PYs), inability to remove the sensor upon first attempt (0.76%; 1.90 events per 100 PYs), and adhesive patch location site irritation (0.66%; 1.59 events per 100 PYs). One nonserious allergic reaction to lidocaine was reported, which resolved with administration of an antihistamine. The full intended sensor life was achieved by 91% of 90-day sensors and 75% of 180-day sensors. The PMCF registry provides real-world evidence that the Eversense CGM system is safe over multiple cycles of use.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy and Safety of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: The PRECISION StudyDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2019
- State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2019
- A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE IIDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2018
- Adoption Barriers for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Their Potential Reduction With a Fully Implanted System: Results From Patient Preference SurveysClinical Diabetes, 2018
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin InjectionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2017
- Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin InjectionsJAMA, 2017
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin InjectionsJAMA, 2017
- Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Participants in the T1D Exchange Clinic RegistryDiabetes Care, 2014
- Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and use of medical care resources: analyses from the SWITCH studyActa Diabetologica, 2014
- Implementation of Treatment Protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDiabetes Care, 1995