A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
Authors:
- Sean Paul TeelingSean Paul Teeling
- Carmel DaviesCDCarmel Davies
- Marlize BarnardMBMarlize Barnard
- Laserina O’connorLOLaserina O’connor
- Alice CoffeyACAlice Coffey
- Veronica LambertVLVeronica Lambert
- Martin McNamaraMartin McNamara
- Dympna TuohyDTDympna Tuohy
- Timothy FrawleyTFTimothy Frawley
- Catherine RedmondCRCatherine Redmond
- Suja SomanadhanSuja Somanadhan
- Mary CaseyMCMary Casey
Open Access
- 13 November 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (22) , 11932
Abstract
Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Service Executive (10990)
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: rapid realist reviewImplementation Science, 2013
- Barriers and enablers to implementing multiple stroke guideline recommendations: a qualitative studyBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Towards a general theory of implementationImplementation Science, 2013
- Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementationImplementation Science, 2012
- Application of lean thinking to health care: issues and observationsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2009
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceImplementation Science, 2009
- Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process modelBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- An overview of six sigma applications in healthcare industryInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2007
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004