Alice Coffey
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Alice Coffey has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anne Gallen
HSE Nursing & Midwifery Planning & Development, Dublin Mid Leinster, Mill Lane, Palmerstown, D20 HY57 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Carmel Bradshaw
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
1 shared publication - Carmel Davies
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Catherine Redmond
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Denise O. Brien
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Dympna Tuohy
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 November 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (22) , 11932
A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation.
- 13 November 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (22) , 11932
Open AccessA Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation.