Knowledge and luck
- 9 July 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 22 (2) , 378-390
Abstract
Nearly all success is due to some mix of ability and luck. But some successes we attribute to the agent’s ability, whereas others we attribute to luck. To better understand the criteria distinguishing credit from luck, we conducted a series of four studies on knowledge attributions. Knowledge is an achievement that involves reaching the truth. But many factors affecting the truth are beyond our control, and reaching the truth is often partly due to luck. Which sorts of luck are compatible with knowledge? We found that knowledge attributions are highly sensitive to lucky events that change the explanation for why a belief is true. By contrast, knowledge attributions are surprisingly insensitive to lucky events that threaten, but ultimately fail to change the explanation for why a belief is true. These results shed light on our concept of knowledge, help explain apparent inconsistencies in prior work on knowledge attributions, and constitute progress toward a general understanding of the relation between success and luck.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- FACTIVE VERBS AND PROTAGONIST PROJECTIONEpisteme, 2014
- EPISTEMIC INTUITIONS IN FAKE-BARN THOUGHT EXPERIMENTSEpisteme, 2014
- GETTIERIZED KNOBE EFFECTSEpisteme, 2013
- Gettier made ESEEPhilosophical Psychology, 2013
- The Epistemic Side-Effect EffectMind & Language, 2010
- Survey-Driven RomanticismReview of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010
- The Case for Contextualism2009
- Acquisition of the Mental State Verb Know by 2- to 5-Year-Old ChildrenJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1997
- IS EPISTEMIC LUCK COMPATIBLE WITH KNOWLEDGE?The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 1992
- I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential AddressProceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1957