Subspecialisation in neurosurgery—does size matter?
- 10 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Neurochirurgica
- Vol. 153 (6) , 1231-1236
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of provider surgical volumes on survival in children with primary tumors of the central nervous system—a population-based studyActa Neurochirurgica, 2011
- Educational Attainment Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer in Great Britain: A Population-Based Cohort StudyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- Health and persistent functional late effects in adult survivors of childhood CNS tumours: A population-based cohort studyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Effect of Surgeon Training, Specialization, and Experience on Outcomes for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Social Outcomes in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study CohortJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- The Effect of Provider Case Volume on Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2009
- Craniotomy for meningioma in the United States between 1988 and 2000: decreasing rate of mortality and the effect of provider caseloadJournal of Neurosurgery, 2005
- Surgery for primary supratentorial brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: The effect of provider caseload and centralization of careNeuro-Oncology, 2005
- Craniotomy for Resection of Pediatric Brain Tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: Effects of Provider Caseloads and Progressive Centralization and Specialization of CareNeurosurgery, 2004
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979