Accelerating Evidence Synthesis: A BERT-Assisted Workflow for Meta-Analyses of Radiotherapy Complications in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study developed and evaluated a BERT-assisted literature screening workflow to support meta-analyses of postradiotherapy complications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The aim was to automate key screening steps to improve downstream screening efficiency and consistency, while minimizing time and bias during manual reviews. Materials and Methods: A bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model was integrated into a standard systematic review pipeline for studies on postradiotherapy complications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The workflow combined automated BERT-based classification with manual verification and followed PRISMA and PICOS guidelines for literature identification, screening, and eligibility assessment. Model training involved hyperparameter tuning and comparison of different optimizers to maximize screening performance against a manually curated reference set, with particular attention to discrimination (AUC) and processing time. Results: From an initial corpus of 6496 records, the combined automated and manual workflow identified 23 eligible studies for meta-analysis. The included studies showed substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 86.85%), supporting the use of a random-effects model to pool outcomes. The BERT model optimized with an Adagrad optimizer achieved an AUC of 0.77 for relevant-study classification and reduced screening time to 1142 s. To demonstrate the workflow’s utility, a downstream meta-analysis was conducted using the identified studies. As a downstream application based on the identified studies, a quantitative synthesis was conducted, in which (meta-analysis of the 23 included studies), a random forest model—evaluated across those studies—achieved an AUC of 0.92 under a fixed-effect analysis for predicting postradiotherapy complications. Conclusions: Integrating BERT into the literature screening phase of meta-analysis for postradiotherapy nasopharyngeal carcinoma complications markedly improved screening efficiency while maintaining acceptable classification performance. This workflow demonstrates the feasibility of transformer-based assistance for systematic reviews and provides a foundation for developing disease-specific, AI-augmented evidence synthesis pipelines in oncology.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of the Executive Yuan of the Republic of China (113-2221-E-992-011-MY2)
- National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of the Executive Yuan of the Republic of China (114-2637-8-992-002)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of Natural Language Processing Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, 2025
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ScreeningmedRxiv, 2024
- Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers in Radiology: A Systematic Review of Natural Language Processing ApplicationsJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2024
- Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine on dementia and cognitive function: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analysisPhytotherapy Research, 2023
- Automated medical literature screening using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2022
- Effectiveness of Fine-tuned BERT Model in Classification of Helpful and Unhelpful Online Customer ReviewsElectronic Commerce Research, 2022
- Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRadiology, 2021
- Appropriate Learning Rates of Adaptive Learning Rate Optimization Algorithms for Training Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021
- Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA StatementJAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 2016
- Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?Psychological Methods, 2006