What makes a good clinical app? Introducing the RCP Health Informatics Unit checklist
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (6) , 519-521
Abstract
Doctors increasingly rely on medical apps running on smart phones or tablet computers to support their work. However, these apps vary hugely in the quality of their data input screens, internal data processing, the methods used to handle sensitive patient data and how they communicate their output to the user. Inspired by Donabedian's approach to assessing quality and the principles of good user interface design, the Royal College of Physicians’ Health Informatics Unit has developed and piloted an 18-item checklist to help clinicians assess the structure, functions and impact of medical apps. Use of this checklist should help clinicians to feel more confident about using medical apps themselves, about recommending them to their staff or prescribing them for patients.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unreliable numbers: error and harm induced by bad design can be reduced by better designJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2015
- Adherence to a Smartphone Application for Weight Loss Compared to Website and Paper Diary: Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- A Comparison of the Reliability of Smartphone Apps for Opioid ConversionDrug Safety, 2013
- The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Communicating Statistical InformationScience, 2000
- The Quality of Medical CareScience, 1978