Is there an Exposure–Response Relationship for Nivolumab in Real-World NSCLC Patients?
Authors:
- Audrey BellesoeurAudrey Bellesoeur
- Edouard OllierEdouard Ollier
- Marie AllardMarie Allard
- Laure HirschLaure Hirsch
- Jennifer ArrondeauJennifer Arrondeau
- Audrey Thomas-SchoemannAudrey Thomas-Schoemann
- Manuela TiakoManuela Tiako
- Nihel KhoudourNihel Khoudour
- Jeanne ChapronJeanne Chapron
- Frédérique GiraudFrédérique Giraud
- Marie WislezMarie Wislez
Open Access
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data from real-world cohort are sparse in non small–cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab. The aim of this prospective observational study was to explore the exposure-response relationship for effectiveness and toxicity of nivolumab in 81 outpatients with metastatic lung cancer. Nivolumab plasma trough concentrations (Cmin) were assayed at days 14, 28, and 42. Prognostic factors (including Cmin) regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored using a multivariate Cox model. A Spearman’s rank test was used to investigate the relationship between Cmin and grade >2 immune-related adverse events (irAE). Mean nivolumab Cmin was 16.2 ± 6.0 µg/mL (n = 76), 25.6 ± 10.2 µg/mL (n = 64) and 33.4 ± 11.3 µg/mL (n = 53) at days 14, 28, and 42, respectively. No pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship was observed with either survival or onset of irAE. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (hazard ratio 1.85, 95%confidence interval 1.02–3.38, p-value = 0.043) and baseline use of corticosteroids (HR 8.08, 95%CI 1.78–36.62, p-value = 0.007) as independent risk factor for PFS and only baseline use of corticosteroids (HR 6.29, 95%CI 1.46–27.08, p-value = 0.013) for OS. No PK/PD relationship for nivolumab was observed in real-world NSCLC patients. This supports the recent use of flat dose regimens without plasma drug monitoring.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2018
- Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression and Relationship with Biology of NSCLCAnticancer Research, 2018
- Clinical Pharmacology Considerations for the Development of Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017
- Nivolumab Exposure–Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Previously Treated Squamous or Nonsquamous Non–Small Cell Lung CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2017
- Exposure–Response Analysis of Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Treated or Untreated Advanced MelanomaThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017
- Assessment of nivolumab benefit–risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 2017
- Quantitative Characterization of the Exposure-Response Relationship for Cancer Immunotherapy: A Case Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced MelanomaCPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 2016
- Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapyNature Reviews Cancer, 2012