Brazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Official document of the Brazilian Thoracic Association based on the GRADE methodology
Authors:
- José Baddini-MartinezJBJosé Baddini-Martinez
- Juliana FerreiraJFJuliana Ferreira
- Suzana TanniSTSuzana Tanni
- Luis Renato AlvesLALuis Renato Alves
- Benedito Francisco Cabral JuniorBJBenedito Francisco Cabral Junior
- Carlos Roberto Ribeiro CarvalhoCCCarlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho
- Talita Jacon CezareTCTalita Jacon Cezare
- Claudia Henrique da CostaCCClaudia Henrique da Costa
- Marcelo Basso GazzanaMGMarcelo Basso Gazzana
- Sérgio JezlerSJSérgio Jezler
- Ronaldo Adib KairallaRKRonaldo Adib Kairalla
- Leticia Kawano-DouradoLKLeticia Kawano-Dourado
Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
- Vol. 46 (2) , e20190423
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a form of chronic interstitial lung disease of unknown cause, which predominantly affects elderly men who are current or former smokers. Even though it is an uncommon disease, it is of great importance because of its severity and poor prognosis. In recent decades, several pharmacological treatment modalities have been investigated for the treatment of this disease, and the classic concepts have therefore been revised. The purpose of these guidelines was to define evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of pharmacological agents in the treatment of IPF in Brazil. We sought to provide guidance on the practical issues faced by clinicians in their daily lives. Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of intervention and Outcome of interest (PICO)-style questions were formulated to address aspects related to the use of corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine, gastroesophageal reflux medications, endothelin-receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, pirfenidone, and nintedanib. To formulate the PICO questions, a group of Brazilian specialists working in the area was assembled and an extensive review of the literature on the subject was carried out. Previously published systematic reviews with meta-analyses were analyzed for the strength of the compiled evidence, and, on that basis, recommendations were developed by employing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The authors believe that the present document represents an important advance to be incorporated in the approach to patients with IPF, aiming mainly to improve its management, and can become an auxiliary tool for defining public policies related to IPF.Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Prednisone, Azathioprine, andN-Acetylcysteine for Pulmonary FibrosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Gastroesophageal Reflux Therapy Is Associated with Longer Survival in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2011
- An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and ManagementAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- A Controlled Trial of Sildenafil in Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2009
- Quality of life and dyspnoea in patients treated with bosentan for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (BUILD-1)European Respiratory Journal, 2009
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008