Benedito Francisco Cabral Junior
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Benedito Francisco Cabral Junior has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adalberto Sperb Rubin
Hospital Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Pavilhão Pereira Filho, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
1 shared publication - Bruno Guedes Baldi
Divisao de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sâo Paulo, Sâo Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication - Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho
Divisao de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sâo Paulo, Sâo Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication - Cláudia Henrique da Costa
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
1 shared publication - Eliane Viana Mancuzo
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
1 shared publication - José Antônio Baddini Martinez
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
- Vol. 46 (2) , e20190423
Brazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Official document of the Brazilian Thoracic Association based on the GRADE methodology
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a form of chronic interstitial lung disease of unknown cause, which predominantly affects elderly men who are current or former smokers. Even though it is an uncommon disease, it is of great importance because of its severity and poor prognosis. In recent decades, several pharmacological treatment modalities have been investigated for the treatment of this disease, and the classic concepts have therefore been revised. The purpose of these guidelines was to define evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of pharmacological agents in the treatment of IPF in Brazil. We sought to provide guidance on the practical issues faced by clinicians in their daily lives. Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of intervention and Outcome of interest (PICO)-style questions were formulated to address aspects related to the use of corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine, gastroesophageal reflux medications, endothelin-receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, pirfenidone, and nintedanib. To formulate the PICO questions, a group of Brazilian specialists working in the area was assembled and an extensive review of the literature on the subject was carried out. Previously published systematic reviews with meta-analyses were analyzed for the strength of the compiled evidence, and, on that basis, recommendations were developed by employing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The authors believe that the present document represents an important advance to be incorporated in the approach to patients with IPF, aiming mainly to improve its management, and can become an auxiliary tool for defining public policies related to IPF.
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
- Vol. 46 (2) , e20190423
Open AccessBrazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Official document of the Brazilian Thoracic Association based on the GRADE methodology
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a form of chronic interstitial lung disease of unknown cause, which predominantly affects elderly men who are current or former smokers. Even though it is an uncommon disease, it is of great importance because of its severity and poor prognosis. In recent decades, several pharmacological treatment modalities have been investigated for the treatment of this disease, and the classic concepts have therefore been revised. The purpose of these guidelines was to define evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of pharmacological agents in the treatment of IPF in Brazil. We sought to provide guidance on the practical issues faced by clinicians in their daily lives. Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of intervention and Outcome of interest (PICO)-style questions were formulated to address aspects related to the use of corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine, gastroesophageal reflux medications, endothelin-receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, pirfenidone, and nintedanib. To formulate the PICO questions, a group of Brazilian specialists working in the area was assembled and an extensive review of the literature on the subject was carried out. Previously published systematic reviews with meta-analyses were analyzed for the strength of the compiled evidence, and, on that basis, recommendations were developed by employing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The authors believe that the present document represents an important advance to be incorporated in the approach to patients with IPF, aiming mainly to improve its management, and can become an auxiliary tool for defining public policies related to IPF.