Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy
Authors:
- Scott L. ParkerSPScott L. Parker
- Scott L. ZuckermanSZScott L. Zuckerman
- Stephen K. MendenhallSMStephen K. Mendenhall
- Clinton J. DevinCDClinton J. Devin
- Anthony L. AsherAAAnthony L. Asher
- Matthew J. McGirtMMMatthew J. McGirt
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 13 (9) , 1006-1012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The discriminative power of patient experience surveysBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathyEuropean Spine Journal, 2011
- Trends in Health Care Expenditures, Utilization, and Health Status Among US Adults With Spine Problems, 1997–2006Spine, 2009
- Patient-reported outcome measures: The importance of patient satisfaction in surgerySurgery, 2009
- Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they?Surgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and ZungJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2005
- Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scaleAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2001
- SF-36 Health Survey UpdateSpine, 2000
- EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy, 1990
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986