Agent-Based Modeling of Consensus Group Formation with Complex Webs of Beliefs
Open Access
Abstract
Formation of consensus groups with shared opinions or views is a common feature of human social life and also a well-known phenomenon in cases when views are complex, as in the case of the formation of scholarly disciplines. In such cases, shared views are not simple sets of opinions but rather complex webs of beliefs (WoBs). Here, we approach such consensus group formation through the agent-based model (ABM). Agents’ views are described as complex, extensive web-like structures resembling semantic networks, i.e., webs of beliefs. In the ABM introduced here, the agents’ interactions and participation in sharing their views are dependent on the similarity of the agents’ webs of beliefs; the greater the similarity, the more likely the interaction and sharing of elements of WoBs. In interactions, the WoBs are altered when agents seek consensus and consensus groups are formed. The consensus group formation depends on the agents’ sensitivity to the similarity of their WoBs. If their sensitivity is low, only one large and diffuse group is formed, while with high sensitivity, many separated and segregated consensus groups emerge. To conclude, we discuss how such results resemble the formation of disciplinary, scholarly consensus groups.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opinion dynamics with similarity-based random neighborsScientific Reports, 2013
- Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the SciencesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categoriesScientometrics, 2012
- Wikipedia Information Flow Analysis Reveals the Scale-Free Architecture of the Semantic SpacePLOS ONE, 2011
- Quantifying social group evolutionNature, 2007
- Vertex intrinsic fitness: How to produce arbitrary scale-free networksPhysical Review E, 2004
- When Smart Groups FailJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2003
- The Analysis of Participation in Small GroupsSmall Group Research, 2002
- The Effect of Contributing Substantively on Perceptions of ParticipationSmall Group Research, 2000
- Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided DiscussionsCognition and Instruction, 1999