Ismo Tapio Koponen

Physics education research has revealed that students have multiple ways of understanding the concept of the photon and that students’ use of it is often incoherent and incomplete. In this study, we explore what kinds of statements pre-service physics teachers and university physics students choose on a multiple-choice questionnaire, designed to reveal students’ stances on three conceptual views of the photon (quantum state, quantum realistic, and naïve dualistic) in the context of quantum optical experiments. The questionnaire was conducted in a pre-post manner. The test group (pre-service physics teachers N = 13) attended an introductory quantum physics course which emphasised coherent use of natural language, and the control group (university physics students pre N = 33, post N = 25) attended a standard introductory course in quantum physics. Pre-test results show that both groups expressed incoherent use of the concept of the photon. The post-test results reveal that after teaching intervention, the test group showed significant improvement in the coherent use of the concept of the photon as a quantum state. The post-test results of the control group remained incoherent. The results show that paying attention to the coherent use of natural language in teaching quantum physics helps pre-service physics teachers to recognise and choose coherent expressions about the photon.

Research in physics education has revealed that students often have incomplete and incoherent ways to use the concept of photon. Most researchers in science education recommend photons to be taken in a realistic sense as existing entities of quantum objects. Furthermore, in science education literature it is often claimed that realistic stance to photons also is preferred by physicists. Taken that photons in quantum theory of light invariably refer to quantized degrees of the freedom of an electromagnetic field it is questionable how one should introduce photons as entities without inadvertently supporting naïve particle-realism about photons, a well-known situation in introductory teaching of quantum theory of light. Fewer researchers suggest that photons should be understood as photon states, quantized degrees of freedom of electromagnetic field, as in contemporary quantum optics and quantum theory of light. Here, by using a questionnaire (a Likert-scale survey), we explore pre-service physics teachers’ preferences to use expressions that can be associated with either quanton or photon state views about photons in context of single-photon double-slit experiment. The questionnaire is administered in two stages (in the beginning and after a teaching sequence) during a pre-service physics teachers’ course addressing quantum optics and technology. Based on the analysis of the responses, we find that at the beginning of the course, the responses are scattered but in the final survey, clusters corresponding to use of photon state-based expressions become more consistent.

Scientific terms and concepts sometimes evolve so that their semantic meanings are changing, to better serve the purposes of their use in scientific practices. Acknowledging the importance of such a process provides a viewpoint on the role of wave-particle duality (WPD) in modern quantum optics and how it is connected to its historical role. The transformation of WPD into a quantitative and operationalised concept is approached here from the viewpoint of the role of WPD as a linguistic practice based on natural language in communicating about experiments and their results and designs. The perspective adopted is based on semantic change and variation of WPD as driven by its role as natural language expression in pursuing the epistemic and the pragmatic goals of the inquiry. This provides a perspective that connects the historical and contemporary roles of WPD through its pragmatic linguistic role. This perspective shifts the focus from philosophical realism-driven questions about WPD as related to the nature or behaviour of photons to questions of how that concept is used in practices of quantum optics research, for what purposes, and with what benefits.

Barad’s agential realism has recently been evoked as a theoretical viewpoint for science education and science education research in approaches that emphasize the role of materiality and matter as a key aspect of learning science. Barad’s agential realism is underpinned by their specific ways of reading quantum physics, its interpretations and, in general, contemplations of the quantum nature of existence. Agential realism is an ontological as well as an epistemological (onto-epistemological) metaphysical position that strives to dissolve the boundaries between subjects and objects, and leaves little room for traditional subject-centered epistemological views (like constructivism) of learning. A closer look is warranted at how the quantum physics underpinnings of agential realism, which are clearly very important for it, appear in its current applications in new materialism within science education research. This critical commentary claims that, in such a context, the conceptualization of learning and educational phenomena derives little if any advantage or practical utility from the quantum physics-inspired metaphysics of agential realism; only metaphorical talk remains. Consequently, we need to be aware of the limited power and plausibility of the quantum-inspired contemplations contained in agential realism if it is adopted as a theoretical viewpoint for science education and science education research.

We analyze here how pre-service teachers explicate their views about the wave-particle duality of photons and what role it plays in their arguments supporting the quantum nature of light. The data for the analysis is provided by 12 written reports about the double-slit experiment with feeble light. The analysis is based on constructing semantic networks corresponding to pre-service teachers’ written texts. Contingency-like associative correlation between word-pairs is used to differentiate between word-pairs, where associations of two terms or words is systematic. Such associations indicate connections, which are significant for key term vocabularies in construction of inferences and arguments. Based on that information of the key vocabulary we then construct the structure of pre-service teachers’ argument for the nature of the photon and its wave-particle duality, in the form of directed argument graphs (DAGs). The results show that argument structures in four to six out of 12 cases meet the goals set for pre-service teacher education. In these cases, experimental aspects and wave-particle duality play an important role in the pre-service teachers’ argument and its structure.

Teaching and learning the language of science is an important part of science education. Learning the vocabulary of science plays a key role in learning the language of science. The meaning of abstract scientific terms builds on their connections with other terms and how they are used. In this research, we study pre-service physics teachers’ physics-related vocabularies and investigate how rich a vocabulary they use and what similarities and differences there are in their vocabularies regarding electrons and photons. We investigate the connectedness of physics terms by categorizing them according to their role in explaining quantum physics and carry out a lexical network analysis for N=60 written reports. The analysis shows that vocabularies do not share much similarity and the reports reflect narrow images of photons and electrons. We conclude that science teacher education needs to pay attention to explicit teaching of the language of science for pre-service teachers.

The manuscript “In the doing of science, what is the place for naturalistic philosophy? Implications for the teaching of science”, according to its title, promises to address the issue of naturalistic philosophy in doing science and in its subtitle,...

Formation of consensus groups with shared opinions or views is a common feature of human social life and also a well-known phenomenon in cases when views are complex, as in the case of the formation of scholarly disciplines. In such cases, shared views are not simple sets of opinions but rather complex webs of beliefs (WoBs). Here, we approach such consensus group formation through the agent-based model (ABM). Agents’ views are described as complex, extensive web-like structures resembling semantic networks, i.e., webs of beliefs. In the ABM introduced here, the agents’ interactions and participation in sharing their views are dependent on the similarity of the agents’ webs of beliefs; the greater the similarity, the more likely the interaction and sharing of elements of WoBs. In interactions, the WoBs are altered when agents seek consensus and consensus groups are formed. The consensus group formation depends on the agents’ sensitivity to the similarity of their WoBs. If their sensitivity is low, only one large and diffuse group is formed, while with high sensitivity, many separated and segregated consensus groups emerge. To conclude, we discuss how such results resemble the formation of disciplinary, scholarly consensus groups.