Comparison of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation With Sedation vs General Anesthesia
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 2013CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2013
- Image‐guided percutaneous renal cryoablation: preoperative risk factors for recurrence and complicationsBJU International, 2012
- Complications following 573 Percutaneous Renal Radiofrequency and Cryoablation ProceduresJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012
- Treatment of Localised Renal Cell CarcinomaEuropean Urology, 2011
- Comparison of Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation for Small (<3.0 cm) Renal MassesJournal of Endourology, 2010
- Small renal masses: current concepts regarding the natural history and reflections on the American Urological Association guidelinesCurrent Opinion in Urology, 2010
- Comparison of Percutaneous and Surgical Approaches to Renal Tumor Ablation: Metaanalysis of Effectiveness and Complication RatesJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008
- Rising Incidence of Small Renal Masses: A Need to Reassess Treatment EffectJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Pain Control Requirements for Percutaneous Ablation of Renal Tumors: Cryoablation versus Radiofrequency Ablation—Initial ObservationsRadiology, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004