Inadvertent Lead Malposition in the Left Heart during Implantation of Cardiac Electric Devices: A Systematic Review
Authors:
- Lorenzo SpighiLSLorenzo Spighi
- Francesco NotaristefanoFNFrancesco Notaristefano
- Silvia PiracciniSPSilvia Piraccini
- Giuseppe GiuffrèGGGiuseppe Giuffrè
- Alberto BarengoABAlberto Barengo
- Matteo D’ammandoMDMatteo D’ammando
- Salvatore NotaristefanoSNSalvatore Notaristefano
- Giuseppe BaglianiGBGiuseppe Bagliani
- Gianluca ZingariniGZGianluca Zingarini
- Fabio AngeliFabio Angeli
- Paolo VerdecchiaPaolo Verdecchia
- Claudio CavalliniCCClaudio Cavallini
Open Access
- 20 October 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Vol. 9 (10) , 362
Abstract
Background. The inadvertent lead malposition in the left heart (ILMLH) is an under-recognized event, which may complicate the implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs). Methods. We investigated the clinical conditions associated with ILMLH and the treatment strategies in these patients. We made a systematic review of the literature and identified 132 studies which reported 157 patients with ILMLH. Results. The mean age of patients was 68 years, and 83 were women. ILMLH was diagnosed, on average, 365 days after CIEDs implantation. Coexisting conditions were patent foramen ovale in 29% of patients, arterial puncture in 24%, perforation of the interatrial septum in 20%, atrial septal defect in 16% and perforation of the interventricular septum in 4%. At the time of diagnosis of ILMLH, 46% of patients were asymptomatic, 31% had acute TIA or stroke and 15% had overt heart failure. Overall, 14% of patients were receiving anticoagulants at the time of diagnosis of ILMLH. After diagnosis of ILMLH, percutaneous or surgical lead extraction was carried out in 93 patients (59%), whereas 43 (27%) received anticoagulation. During a mean 9-month follow-up after diagnosis of ILMLH, four patients experienced TIA or stroke (three on oral anticoagulant therapy and one after percutaneous lead extraction). Conclusion. ILMLH is a rare complication, which is usually diagnosed about one year after implantation of CIEDs. An early diagnosis of ILMLH is important. Lead extraction is a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulants.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- the non-profit organization Fondazione Umbra Cuore e Ipertensione-ONLUS
This publication has 101 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sinus venosus atrial septal defect: a rare cause of misplacement of pacemaker leadsInternational Medical Case Reports Journal, 2013
- Malposition of the pacemaker lead in the left ventricleRevista Portuguesa de Cardiologia, 2013
- Double left ventricular pacing following accidental malpositioning of the right ventricular electrode during implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy deviceJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2013
- Inadvertent placement of left ventricular endocardial pacing leadJournal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2012
- Recurrent strokes caused by a malpositioned pacemaker leadAge and Ageing, 2011
- Transient ischaemic attack due to the lead of an implantable defibrillator in the left heartInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Treatment of a malpositioned transcutaneous ventricular pacing lead in the left ventricle via direct aortic punctureEP Europace, 2011
- Long-term Pacemaker Lead Malposition. Role of EchocardiographyRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2011
- Ventricular tachycardia and amaurosis fugax following inadvertent left ventricular pacingInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Real-time, two-dimensional echocardiographic features of pacemaker perforation.Circulation, 1981