Claudio Cavallini

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AFIB), the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke, heart failure, and death. Because of the recent advances in AFIB management and the availability of new oral anticoagulants (OACs), there is a need for a systematic and predefined collection of contemporary data regarding its management and treatment. Methods: The objective of the ongoing ITALY-AFIB registry is to evaluate the long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with AFIB and to verify the implementation of the current guidelines for stroke prevention in these patients. The registry includes consecutive in- and out-patients with first diagnosed, paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AFIB. In patients in sinus rhythm at entry, the qualifying episode of AFIB, confirmed by ECG diagnosis, had to have occurred within 1 year before entry. The clinical record form is web-based and accessible by personal keyword. Results: Enrolment into the registry started in the year 2013. In a current cohort of 2470 patients (mean age 75 ± 11 years, males 56%), the mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.7 ± 1.8, and the mean HAS-BLED was 1.6 ± 0.9. There were no significant sex differences in the AFIB subtypes. At the end of the inclusion visit and after receiving knowledge of the web-based electronic estimate of risk for stroke and bleeding, the proportion of patients discharged with OACs was 80%. After exclusion of patients with first diagnosed AFIB (n = 397), the proportion of patients with prescription of OACs rose from 66% before the visit to 82% on discharge (p < 0.0001). Prescription of aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs fell from 18% before the visit to 10% on discharge (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: A web-based management of AFIB with automated estimation of risk profiles appears to favorably affect adherence to AFIB guidelines, based on a high proportion of patients treated with OACs and a substantial decline in the use of antiplatelet drugs.

The myocardial bridge (MB) is a common anomaly of the coronary tree, very often clinically silent. The artery typically involved is the left anterior descending in its proximal and/or middle portion. MB can cause ischaemia with various mechanisms, directly proportional to the degree of compression of the intra-myocardial tract, which impairs the coronary flow. It is a dynamic phenomenon that is affected by the adrenergic tone and is therefore often brought by physical exercise. MB, when symptomatic, often begins with angina from exertion; some patients have more severe conditions such as unstable angina or myocardial infarction. Coronary vasospasm related to MB-induced endothelial dysfunction can explain a number of cases that come to observation even with catastrophic pictures such as ventricular fibrillation caused by ischaemia. The diagnostic workup includes the non-invasive study using computed tomography angiography and the invasive study of the haemodynamic impact using pressure and Doppler guides. In symptomatic cases, drug therapy with a beta-blocker is enough to manage angina. When it fails, there is the option of coronary angioplasty or surgical treatment techniques.

Background. The inadvertent lead malposition in the left heart (ILMLH) is an under-recognized event, which may complicate the implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs). Methods. We investigated the clinical conditions associated with ILMLH and the treatment strategies in these patients. We made a systematic review of the literature and identified 132 studies which reported 157 patients with ILMLH. Results. The mean age of patients was 68 years, and 83 were women. ILMLH was diagnosed, on average, 365 days after CIEDs implantation. Coexisting conditions were patent foramen ovale in 29% of patients, arterial puncture in 24%, perforation of the interatrial septum in 20%, atrial septal defect in 16% and perforation of the interventricular septum in 4%. At the time of diagnosis of ILMLH, 46% of patients were asymptomatic, 31% had acute TIA or stroke and 15% had overt heart failure. Overall, 14% of patients were receiving anticoagulants at the time of diagnosis of ILMLH. After diagnosis of ILMLH, percutaneous or surgical lead extraction was carried out in 93 patients (59%), whereas 43 (27%) received anticoagulation. During a mean 9-month follow-up after diagnosis of ILMLH, four patients experienced TIA or stroke (three on oral anticoagulant therapy and one after percutaneous lead extraction). Conclusion. ILMLH is a rare complication, which is usually diagnosed about one year after implantation of CIEDs. An early diagnosis of ILMLH is important. Lead extraction is a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulants.

Hypertension is the most frequent chronic and non-communicable disease all over the world, with about 1.5 billion affected individuals worldwide. Its impact is currently growing, particularly in low-income countries. Even in high-income countries, hypertension remains largely underdiagnosed and undertreated, with consequent low rates of blood pressure (BP) control. Notwithstanding the large number of clinical observational studies and randomized trials over the past four decades, it is sad to note that in the last few years there has been an impressive paucity of innovative studies. Research focused on BP mechanisms and novel antihypertensive drugs is slowing dramatically. The present review discusses some advances in the management of hypertensive patients, and could play a clinical role in the years to come. First, digital/health technology is expected to be increasingly used, although some crucial points remain (development of non-intrusive and clinically validated devices for ambulatory BP measurement, robust storing systems enabling rapid analysis of accrued data, physician-patient interactions, etc.). Second, several areas should be better outlined with regard to BP diagnosis and treatment targets. Third, from a therapeutic standpoint, existing antihypertensive drugs, which are generally effective and well tolerated, should be better used by exploiting available and novel free and fixed combinations. In particular, spironolactone and other mineral-corticoid receptor antagonists should be used more frequently to improve BP control. In particular, some drugs initially developed for conditions different from hypertension including heart failure and diabetes have demonstrated to lower BP significantly and should therefore be considered. Finally, renal artery denervation is another procedure that has proven effective in the management of hypertension.

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, an aggressive approach with coronary angiography and revascularization leads to important benefits compared to medical therapy alone. On the contrary, the prognostic impact of coronary revascularization in patients suffering from stable coronary artery disease has long been the subject of debate. The pivotal study in this area is COURAGE, published in 2007, in which coronary revascularization showed no benefit about the combined endpoint of death from all causes and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), compared to medical therapy. The ISCHEMIA study, published in 2020, compared selective coronary angiography and revascularization vs. a non-invasive approach. By protocol, the patients were initially evaluated with coronary computed axial tomography angiography: in case of coronary stenosis >50%, they were then randomized to the two strategies. While in the invasive arm patients were revascularized, in the non-invasive arm revascularization was used only in case of patient destabilization. As in COURAGE, the results of ISCHEMIA did not demonstrate superiority of revascularization over medical therapy alone for a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, AMI, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or cardiac arrest. Based on recent evidence from ISCHEMIA, it is therefore confirmed that coronary revascularization in stable patients does not seem to improve the prognosis compared to medical therapy alone.

Stable ischaemic heart disease is a frequent and very heterogeneous condition. Drug therapy is important, in these patients, for improving their prognosis and controlling their symptoms. The typical clinical manifestation of obstructive coronary disease is angina pectoris. This symptom can be improved by various classes of compounds, namely beta-blockers (BBs), calcium antagonist, and nitrates. More recently, ranolazine and ivabradine have been introduced. All these drugs have been proven to reduce significantly angina. On the other hand, there are no evidences supporting improvement in prognosis, besides for the use of BBs, in patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) or systolic dysfunction. Besides drugs for symptoms control, these patients also receive antiplatelet drugs, specifically aspirin, and lipid lowering compounds such as statins. Furthermore, recent evidences supported the use of low doses direct anticoagulant, or a second antiplatelet agent in patients with previous MI. Similarly, a very low LDL cholesterol level, such as obtained with PCKS9 inhibitors, seems very beneficial in these patients. It is possible that in the near future a specific role for neo-angiogenesis factors and cellular therapies, could be proven, albeit, presently these treatments are not supported by solid evidences.

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a percutaneous assist device that is easy to implant, is associated with low complication rates and, therefore, is widely used. It is commonly applied by femoral access, although it can be used with axillary access. It reduces afterload and preload, with a slight increase in mean arterial pressure and coronary perfusion. For these characteristics, it has been extensively used in cardiogenic shock, even without a clear demonstration of efficacy from randomized clinical trials; the IABP-SHOCK II study, the largest trial carried out so far, failed to demonstrate the usefulness of IABP in this setting. Furthermore, the routine use of IABP in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction was not associated with any benefit in reducing ischemic area at cardiac magnetic resonance, as shown by the CRISP-AMI trial. For these reasons, the international guidelines do not support the routine use of IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, suggesting instead its use in different scenarios such as heart failure associated with acute mechanical complications or acute myocarditis. IABP is currently used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions or surgical coronary revascularization judged at high risk of complications. In the former scenario, the evidence from the literature is very scarce; in the latter one, small trials and meta-analytical studies suggest a treatment benefit with IABP in the preoperative period. Despite limited evidence of efficacy, IABP will continue to play an important role in today's cardiology and is going to remain the most widely used mechanical circulatory support device.

Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a steadily expanding treatment for the pathology of the aortic valve, its role in the replacement of native aortic valves following valve-sparing surgery has not been investigated. Among 150 patients who underwent TAVI at the authors' institution, three (2%) had a failed valve-sparing operation. The in-hospital outcome, mid-term mortality, and valvular function of the three patients were evaluated retrospectively. These patients, who were deemed at high surgical risk by the heart team, underwent TAVI for predominant severe aortic stenosis (n = 2) or pure severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (n = 1). A self-expandable CoreValve prosthesis was inserted via femoral access in all three patients. Based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria (VARC-2), implantation was successful in all cases, with only one major access site complication and no more than mild residual AR. At a follow up of 13 ± 6 months there were no deaths and the mean transvalvular gradient remained low (7 ± 6 mmHg at discharge; 7 ± 4 mmHg at follow up), without any echocardiographic signs of valve deterioration. The results obtained with this small patient cohort demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and favorable mid-term outcomes of TAVI for failed valve-sparing operations in high surgical risk patients. However, these findings must be validated in larger cohorts before extending such treatment routinely to this subset of patients.