Low b-values in apparent diffusion coefficient calculations overestimate diffusion in rectal cancer
Open Access
- 19 October 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Oncologica
- Vol. 64, 1430-1436
Abstract
Background and purpose: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), is commonly calculated using a monoexponential model. However, there is no consensus on optimal b-value selection for ADC quantification in rectal cancer. This prospective observational study evaluated how varying b-value combinations influence ADC values. Patient/material and methods: DWI with seven b-values (b = 0, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1,000, and 1,300 s/mm2) was acquired from 23 rectal cancer patients in the OxyTarget study (NCT01816607) using a 1.5T Philips Achieva scanner. Two radiologists independently delineated whole-tumour volumes of interest. ADC values were calculated using 18 different b-value combinations and compared with a biexponential reference. Results: Tumour ADCs varied significantly across b-value combinations. Excluding low b-values (b ≤ 100 s/mm²) led to reduced ADCs. Although b = 0 s/mm² is commonly included in ADC calculations, this study demonstrates that its inclusion leads to substantial overestimation. The use of two or three b-values from b = 500, 1,000, and 1,300 s/mm² yielded the smallest deviations from the biexponential reference. Interpretation: In rectal cancer, tumour ADC calculated using the monoexponential model is strongly influenced by the choice of b-values. By eliminating the contribution from perfusion (b ≤ 100 s/mm2) the uncertainty in the calculations is significantly reduced. Our findings support the use of b-values exceeding 100 s/mm², ideally in combination with a high b-value of at least 1,000 s/mm², when assessing diffusion using the monoexponential model. Consistent b-value combinations across studies are recommended for reliable quantitative comparisons of ADC values.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Volumetric histogram analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for predicting complete tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomaEuropean Radiology, 2024
- Added value of histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging for the evaluation of complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancerEuropean Radiology, 2024
- Assessment of prognostic indicators and KRAS mutations in rectal cancer using a fractional-order calculus MR diffusion model: whole tumor histogram analysisAbdominal Radiology, 2024
- R2* mapping and reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging for preoperative assessment of nonenlarged lymph node metastasis in rectal cancerNMR in Biomedicine, 2024
- Improved effects of the b-value for 2000 sec/mm2 DWI on an accurate qualitative and quantitative assessment of rectal cancerArab Journal of Gastroenterology, 2023
- Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meetingEuropean Radiology, 2017
- Diffusion-weighted MRI in locally advanced rectal cancerStrahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2012
- Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinationsEuropean Radiology, 2012
- Diffusion‐weighted MRI in rectal cancer: Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressivenessJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2012
- Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficientsNMR in Biomedicine, 2008