Radiologists' interpretive skills in screening vs. diagnostic mammography: are they related?
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 40 (6) , 1096-1103
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS-010591)
- National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA-107623, K05 CA-104699)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Annual Interpretive Volume on Screening Mammography Performance in the United StatesRadiology, 2011
- Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with AccuracyRadiology, 2009
- Variability of Interpretive Accuracy Among Diagnostic Mammography FacilitiesJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Accuracy of Short-Interval Follow-Up Mammograms by Patient and Radiologist CharacteristicsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Performance of Diagnostic MammographyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessmentBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- Physician Predictors of Mammographic AccuracyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Assessing mammographers' accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Better Bootstrap Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987