The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive
Authors:
- Daven C PresgravesDPDaven C Presgraves
- R Kelly DaweRDR Kelly Dawe
- Kelly A DyerKDKelly A Dyer
- Lila FishmanLFLila Fishman
- Soumitra A BhideSBSoumitra A Bhide
- Sasha L BradshawSBSasha L Bradshaw
- Meghan J BradyMBMeghan J Brady
- Alejandro BurgaABAlejandro Burga
- Cécile CourretCCCécile Courret
- Brandon L FagenBFBrandon L Fagen
- Ana Beatriz Stein Machado FerrettiAFAna Beatriz Stein Machado Ferretti
- Reka K KelemenRKReka K Kelemen
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 23 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 43 (2)
Abstract
Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that gain transmission advantages by distorting equal, Mendelian segregation. For decades, biologists have considered meiotic drivers as interesting, albeit esoteric, case studies. It is now clear, however, that meiotic drive is more common and phylogenetically widespread than previously supposed. Indeed, intensive study of a few well-known cases has begun to reveal the evolutionary genomic consequences of meiotic drive. We argue here that many features of genome evolution, content, and organization that are seemingly inexplicable by organismal adaptation or nearly neutral processes are instead best accounted for by recurrent histories of meiotic drive. We review how meiotic drive can affect the evolution of sequences, gene copy numbers, genes with functions in meiosis and gametogenesis, signatures of “selection,” chromosome rearrangements, and karyotype evolution. We also explore the interactions of meiotic drive elements with other classes of selfish genetic elements, including satellite DNAs, transposable elements, and with the endogenous host genes involved in drive suppression. Finally, we argue that some aspects of drive-mediated genome evolution are now sufficiently well established that we might reverse the direction of discovery—rather than ask how drive affects genome evolution, we can use genome data to discover new putative drive elements.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (NSF MCB CAREER 2047052)
- National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB-2344468)
- National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB-1737824)
- National Institutes of Health General Medical Sciences (R35GM119515)
- National Institutes of Health General Medical Sciences (R01GM148442)
- European Research Council
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2020/06188-5)
- Royal Society (DHF\R1\180120)
- Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
- Swedish Research Council VR (2021-0429)
This publication has 156 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II linkage modification in the segregation distortion systemTheoretical Population Biology, 2004
- Is Stellate a relict meiotic driver?Genetics, 1992
- Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena.Genetics, 1991
- Evidence for horizontal transmission of the P transposable element between Drosophila species.Genetics, 1990
- The effect of novel chromosome position and variable dose on the genetic behavior of the Responder (Rsp) element of the Segregation distorter (SD) system of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics, 1989
- About maize transposable elements and developmentCell, 1989
- THE INFLUENCE OF GENETIC BACKGROUND AND THE HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOME 17 ON t-HAPLOTYPE TRANSMISSION RATIO DISTORTION IN MICEGenetics, 1986
- A new spontaneous mutation at the tufted locus within a mouse t haplotypeGenetics Research, 1985
- GENETIC DISSECTION OF SEGREGATION DISTORTION. I. SUICIDE COMBINATIONS OF SD GENESGenetics, 1974
- Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive I. The solution of a special case and some general implicationsTheoretical Population Biology, 1973