Cécile Courret

Although strict maternal transmission of mitochondria is a general feature of animals for ensuring homogeneity in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) across generations, exceptions were reported in the recent past. For example, some extremely rare but spectacular cases of heteroplasmy and paternal transmission in humans have questioned the universal evolutionary principle. Hence, as an alternative, the Mega-NUMT concept was coined to explain this discovery and was thereafter partly proven to exist. This concept expands on the quite common transfer of mtDNA fragments to the nucleus (NUMTs) by considering the existence of multicopy mitochondrial nuclear insertions. Mega-NUMT reports are currently restricted to a few cases in animals, including humans. However, their detailed genomic organization, natural prevalence, and potential biological functions remain unclear. Here, we discovered that up to 60 full-sized mitochondrial genomes are integrated into the nuclear genome of the neotropical Drosophila paulistorum using long-read sequencing and in situ hybridization. The copies are organized in one cluster on chromosome 3, which we designated the “Dpau Mega-NUMT”. Contrary to the rarity in humans, this Mega-NUMT is found at high prevalence (40%) in both laboratory lines and natural D. paulistorum populations of different semispecies. Additionally, the Mega-NUMT copies are phylogenetically separated from the current mitotypes of D. paulistorum. Together, these observations suggest long-term maintenance of the Mega-NUMT in nature. Hence, we propose that the Dpau Mega-NUMT may have been transferred to the nuclear genome before the D. paulistorum semispecies radiation and speculate based on these findings that it possibly is maintained at relatively high prevalence in nature by balancing selection or due to a yet undetermined function.

La distorsion de ségrégation méiotique est une entorse à la loi de ségrégation équilibrée des allèles via les gamètes. Les gènes ou éléments génétiques causaux (distorteurs de ségrégation) empêchent, chez les hétérozygotes, la production de gamètes qui ne les contiennent pas. Ils peuvent ainsi se répandre dans les populations même s’ils sont délétères pour les individus porteurs.Parce qu'ils induisent un biais du sexe ratio, les distorteurs liés au sexe et s'exprimant dans le sexe hétérogamétique sont générateurs de conflits intragénomiques, caractérisés par l'évolution de suppresseurs qui tendent à rétablir l'équilibre des sexes. Ce processus peut conduire à l’émergence de nouvelles espèces, à l’évolution du comportement reproducteur ou du déterminisme du sexe.Dans l'espèce Drosophila simulans, des distorteurs liés au chromosome X, perturbent la ségrégation du chromosome Y lors de la méiose mâle. La descendance des mâles porteurs est alors très majoritairement femelle. Un de ces éléments distorteurs, le gène HP1D2, code une protéine qui se lie au chromosome Y avant la méiose. La distorsion est le fait d'allèles dysfonctionnels de HP1D2 (qui ont un faible niveau de transcrits testiculaires et/ou ont une délétion du domaine d’interaction protéine-protéine). Dans les populations naturelles envahies par les distorteurs, ceux-ci se trouvent neutralisés par des suppresseurs autosomaux et des chromosomes Y résistants.Le premier volet de ma thèse a été consacré au déterminisme génétique de la suppression autosomale. Par cartographie de QTL, utilisant des lignées recombinantes consanguines, j'ai révélé la complexité de ce déterminisme : 5 QTLs avec de nombreuses relation d’épistasie.Le deuxième volet est consacré au chromosome Y, qui présente, d’importante variations phénotypiques pour la résistance aux distorteurs. Nous avons étudié ses variations moléculaires et structurales et la dynamique des Y résistants dans les populations naturelles. Le séquençage de différents chromosomes Y, résistants ou sensibles, a permis de retracer l’histoire évolutive du chromosome Y en relation avec celle des distorteurs.Le dernier volet est une étude cytologique pour comparer le comportement des formes sauvages et distortrices de la protéine HP1D2 dans les spermatogonies.Dans l’ensemble ces travaux apportent un éclairage sur les bases génétiques et moléculaires du système Paris et sur son évolution.

Background: Although strict maternal transmission of mitochondria is a general feature of animals and humans for ensuring homogeneity in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) across generations, exceptions were reported in the recent past. For example, some extremely rare but spectacular cases of heteroplasmy and paternal transmission in humans have questioned the universal evolutionary principle. Hence, as an alternative, the Mega-NUMT concept was coined to explain this discovery and was thereafter partly proven to exist. This concept expands on the quite common transfer of mtDNA fragments to the nucleus (NUMTs) by considering the existence of multicopy mitochondrial nuclear insertions. Mega-NUMT reports are currently restricted to a few cases in animals, including humans. However, even in humans, their detailed genomic organization, natural prevalence, and potential biological functions remain unclear. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here, we discovered that up to 60 full-sized mitochondrial genomes are integrated into the nuclear genome of the neotropical fruit fly Drosophila paulistorum using long-read sequencing and confirmed their presence by in situ hybridization. The copies are organized in one cluster on chromosome 3, which we, due to its similarity with the Mega-NUMT concept, designated the “ Dpau Mega-NUMT”. Contrary to the rarity in humans, this Mega-NUMT is found at high prevalence (40%) in both long-term laboratory lines and natural D. paulistorum populations of different semispecies. Additionally, the mitochondrial copies in the Mega-NUMT cluster are phylogenetically separated from the current mitotypes of D. paulistorum . Together, these observations suggest long-term maintenance of the Mega-NUMT in nature. Hence, we propose that the Dpau Mega-NUMT may have been transferred to the nuclear genome before D. paulistorum semispecies radiation and maintained at relatively high prevalence in nature by balancing selection due to yet undetermined functions. Conclusions/Significance: To our knowledge, this is the first verified existence and detailed dissection of a Mega-NUMT outside cats and humans. We show that Mega-NUMTs can be persistent in nature, even at high prevalence, potentially due to balancing selection. Our findings strengthen the importance of high-quality long-read sequencing technologies for deciphering complex repeat-rich genomic regions to deepen our understanding of the dynamics of genome evolution within genomic “dark matter”.

Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that gain transmission advantages by distorting equal, Mendelian segregation. For decades, biologists have considered meiotic drivers as interesting, albeit esoteric, case studies. It is now clear, however, that meiotic drive is more common and phylogenetically widespread than previously supposed. Indeed, intensive study of a few well-known cases has begun to reveal the evolutionary genomic consequences of meiotic drive. We argue here that many features of genome evolution, content, and organization that are seemingly inexplicable by organismal adaptation or nearly neutral processes are instead best accounted for by recurrent histories of meiotic drive. We review how meiotic drive can affect the evolution of sequences, gene copy numbers, genes with functions in meiosis and gametogenesis, signatures of “selection,” chromosome rearrangements, and karyotype evolution. We also explore the interactions of meiotic drive elements with other classes of selfish genetic elements, including satellite DNAs, transposable elements, and with the endogenous host genes involved in drive suppression. Finally, we argue that some aspects of drive-mediated genome evolution are now sufficiently well established that we might reverse the direction of discovery—rather than ask how drive affects genome evolution, we can use genome data to discover new putative drive elements.

Centromeres reside in rapidly evolving, repeat-rich genomic regions, despite their essential function in chromosome segregation. Across organisms, centromeres are rich in selfish genetic elements such as transposable elements and satellite DNAs that can bias their transmission through meiosis. However, these elements still need to cooperate at some level and contribute to, or avoid interfering with, centromere function. To gain insight into the balance between conflict and cooperation at centromeric DNA, we take advantage of the close evolutionary relationships within the Drosophila simulans clade—D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana—and their relative, D. melanogaster. Using chromatin profiling combined with high-resolution fluorescence in situ hybridization on stretched chromatin fibers, we characterize all centromeres across these species. We discovered dramatic centromere reorganization involving recurrent shifts between retroelements and satellite DNAs over short evolutionary timescales. We also reveal the recent origin (D. sechellia, where the X and fourth centromeres now sit on telomere-specific retroelements. Finally, the Y chromosome centromeres, which are the only chromosomes that do not experience female meiosis, do not show dynamic cycling between satDNA and TEs. The patterns of rapid centromere turnover in these species are consistent with genetic conflicts in the female germline and have implications for centromeric DNA function and karyotype evolution. Regardless of the evolutionary forces driving this turnover, the rapid reorganization of centromeric sequences over short evolutionary timescales highlights their potential as hotspots for evolutionary innovation.

Large genome structural variations can impact genome regulation and integrity. Repeat-rich regions like pericentric heterochromatin are vulnerable to structural rearrangements although we know little about how often these rearrangements occur over evolutionary time. Repetitive genome regions are particularly difficult to study with genomic approaches, as they are missing from most genome assemblies. However, cytogenetic approaches offer a direct way to detect large rearrangements involving pericentric heterochromatin. Here, we use a cytogenetic approach to reveal large structural rearrangements associated with the X pericentromeric region of Drosophila simulans. These rearrangements involve large blocks of satellite DNA—the 500-bp and Rsp-like satellites—which colocalize in the X pericentromeric heterochromatin. We find that this region is polymorphic not only among different strains, but between isolates of the same strain from different labs, and even within individual isolates. On the one hand, our observations raise questions regarding the potential impact of such variation at the phenotypic level and our ability to control for such genetic variability. On the other hand, this highlights the very rapid turnover of the pericentric heterochromatin most likely associated with genomic instability of the X pericentromere. It represents a unique opportunity to study the dynamics of pericentric heterochromatin, the evolution of associated satellites on a very short time scale, and to better understand how structural variation arises.

Centromeres reside in rapidly evolving, repeat-rich genomic regions, despite their essential function in chromosome segregation. Across organisms, centromeres are rich in selfish genetic elements such as transposable elements and satellite DNAs that can bias their transmission through meiosis. However, these elements still need to cooperate at some level and contribute to, or avoid interfering with, centromere function. To gain insight into the balance between conflict and cooperation at centromeric DNA, we take advantage of the close evolutionary relationships within the Drosophila simulans clade – D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana – and their relative, D. melanogaster . Using chromatin profiling combined with high resolution fluorescence in situ hybridization on stretched DNA, we characterize all centromeres across these species. We discovered dramatic centromere reorganization involving recurrent shifts between retroelements and satellite DNAs over short evolutionary timescales. We also reveal the recent origin (D. sechellia, where the X and 4 ^th centromeres now sit on telomere-specific retroelements. Finally, the Y chromosome centromeres, which are the only chromosomes that do not experience female meiosis, do not show dynamic cycling between satDNA and TEs. The patterns of rapid centromere turnover in these species are consistent with genetic conflicts in the female germline and have implications for centromeric DNA function and karyotype evolution. Regardless of the evolutionary forces driving this turnover, the rapid reorganization of centromeric sequences over short evolutionary timescales highlights their potential as hotspots for evolutionary innovation.

The recent evolutionary history of the Y chromosome in Drosophila simulans, a worldwide species of Afrotropical origin, is closely linked to that of X-linked meiotic drivers (Paris system). The spread of the Paris drivers in natural populations has elicited the selection of drive-resistant Y chromosomes. To infer the evolutionary history of the Y chromosome in relation to the Paris drive, we sequenced 21 iso-Y lines, each carrying a Y chromosome from a different location. Among them, 13 lines carry a Y chromosome that is able to counteract the effect of the drivers. Despite their very different geographical origins, all sensitive Y's are highly similar, suggesting that they share a recent common ancestor. The resistant Y chromosomes are more divergent and segregate in four distinct clusters. The phylogeny of the Y chromosome confirms that the resistant lineage predates the emergence of Paris drive. The ancestry of the resistant lineage is further supported by the examination of Y-linked sequences in the sister species of D. simulans, Drosophila sechellia and Drosophila mauritiana. We also characterized the variation in repeat content among Y chromosomes and identified multiple simple satellites associated with resistance. Altogether, the molecular polymorphism allows us to infer the demographic and evolutionary history of the Y chromosome and provides new insights on the genetic basis of resistance.